Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,361 bytes removed ,  12:31, November 17, 2023
m
Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by RobSmith
Line 129: Line 129:  
:::::Thank you. And I'm sure God will thank you too, someday eventually. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]</sup> 18:28, November 9, 2023 (EST)
 
:::::Thank you. And I'm sure God will thank you too, someday eventually. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]</sup> 18:28, November 9, 2023 (EST)
   −
== Andy, this is this editing box that you, RobSmith, I or any other editor doesn't use super consistently that RobSmith is using as a tool to harass me with. Hell will freeze over before I use this editing box ==
+
== Discourteousness: Hell will freeze over before I become courteous to other editors and stop clogging up Recent Changes with my Essays and triplicate cut n paste [[spam]] from my user space==
    
In order to irritate me, RobSmith is insisting that every minor edit I make that I check the minor edit box.  
 
In order to irritate me, RobSmith is insisting that every minor edit I make that I check the minor edit box.  
Line 158: Line 158:     
I am sure things can be worked out. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:09, November 15, 2023 (EST)
 
I am sure things can be worked out. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:09, November 15, 2023 (EST)
−
  −
[[File:We don't need no stinking minor edit box checking.jpg|thumbnail|center|700px|Minor edit box checking? We don't need no stinking minor edit box checking!]]
  −
{{Clear}}
  −
Despite not super consistently using the minor edit box himself, User: RobSmith tried to mandate that other Conservapedians use it in the Conservapedia Guidelines. Of course I removed it.
  −
  −
I hope I have it clear enough that Hell will freeze over before I use the minor edit box. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:00, November 17, 2023 (EST)
      
== Some great news: Search engine traffic is up 25%. Also, the Hollywood values article now ranks #1 at Google. My analysis and the changes I made to the article/website paid off ==
 
== Some great news: Search engine traffic is up 25%. Also, the Hollywood values article now ranks #1 at Google. My analysis and the changes I made to the article/website paid off ==
Line 175: Line 169:  
And I am sure that other things can be done to increase search engine traffic too. I plan on having access to some great web marketing tools in the future, but my initial analysis and implementation was very successful from the time and return on investment point of view. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:47, November 15, 2023 (EST)
 
And I am sure that other things can be done to increase search engine traffic too. I plan on having access to some great web marketing tools in the future, but my initial analysis and implementation was very successful from the time and return on investment point of view. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:47, November 15, 2023 (EST)
 
:I am continuing to optimize the Hollywood values article so it has "sticking power" in terms of better keeping its #1 Google ranking. I am ramping up some things in my off-wiki life, but I will try to get in contact with you as soon as I can. The purpose of my call will be to have Conservapedia continue to gain search engine traffic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:01, November 15, 2023 (EST)
 
:I am continuing to optimize the Hollywood values article so it has "sticking power" in terms of better keeping its #1 Google ranking. I am ramping up some things in my off-wiki life, but I will try to get in contact with you as soon as I can. The purpose of my call will be to have Conservapedia continue to gain search engine traffic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:01, November 15, 2023 (EST)
−
::Andy, due to some changes in some off-wiki projects, I am not sure when I will get back to you about my additional work on the Hollywood values article so it has more staying power in terms of its #1 Google ranking. So here are some suggestions to hopefully expedite matters: '''1)''' I added some pictures in the top half of the article, but the page needs more pictures. '''2)''' Currently, the page has some people who are in the music business and not in the cinema and television/streaming businesses (Some television/streaming shows are produced in Hollywood). An article about Hollywood values should soley be about the values of the people in the cinema and television/streaming show business. The music business people should be removed from the article. I say this because the search engines are all about searcher intent so its better if an article be focused on the topic they are interested in. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:11, November 16, 2023 (EST)
  −
  −
== re: NFL articles ==
  −
  −
An article idea to complement your [[Unplug the NFL]] and [[NFL values]] articles. 
  −
  −
Consider creating an article called [[List of NFL scandals]] or [[NFL scandals]]. If you want some content ideas, here are a few sources: [https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/10-biggest-scandals-nfl-wants-forget 10 biggest scandals the NFL wants you to forget] and [https://www.history.com/news/nfl-scandals-controversy 8 Scandals That Rocked the NFL].
  −
  −
Conservapedia's [[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]] has over 60,000 page views. And its [[Atheist organizations and scandals]] page has over 24,000 page views.
  −
  −
I hope this suggestion is helpful to you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:22, November 16, 2023 (EST)
 
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,353

edits

Navigation menu