Changes

'''2.''' Next, in terms of a first impressions (namely the first 1-3 seconds), take a look at the [[Joe Biden]] article.  Now compare it with the December 28, 2021 version of the Joe Biden article which is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Biden&oldid=1826710 HERE] and the May 26, 2021 version of the article which is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Biden&oldid=1760432 HERE].  

'''2.''' Next, in terms of a first impressions (namely the first 1-3 seconds), take a look at the [[Joe Biden]] article.  Now compare it with the December 28, 2021 version of the Joe Biden article which is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Biden&oldid=1826710 HERE] and the May 26, 2021 version of the article which is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Biden&oldid=1760432 HERE].  

'''3.''' Next, in terms of first impressions (namely the first 1-3 seconds), take a look at Conservapedia's [[Volodymyr Zelensky]] article. Now look at Wikipedia's Volodymyr Zelensky article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volodymyr_Zelenskyy HERE]. By the way, I am no fan of Volodymyr Zelensky and think he is a corrupt, authoritarian and foolish leader.  

'''3.''' Next, in terms of first impressions (namely the first 1-3 seconds), take a look at Conservapedia's [[Volodymyr Zelensky]] article. Now look at Wikipedia's Volodymyr Zelensky article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volodymyr_Zelenskyy HERE]. Which article has a better first impression (the first 1-3 seconds of seeing an article)? By the way, I am no fan of Volodymyr Zelensky and think he is a corrupt, authoritarian and foolish leader.  

As you are aware, I am no fan of [[Richard Dawkins]]. Despite this, I designed an attractive lede and general first impression of the article and as a result, its page view count was over 1,500,000 page views (the view counter got reset) and the article had an impact. For example, ''Ms. Magazine'' cited the article before Richard Dawkins' very public conflicts with feminists that lead to his downfall in popularity and caused a big schism in the [[atheist movement]] which in turn caused the [[Decline of the atheist movement]].  During the time of the atheist movement in terms of its peak, the Conservapedia Richard Dawkins article ranked in the Google top 10 for the term "Richard Dawkins".  

As you are aware, I am no fan of [[Richard Dawkins]]. Despite this, I designed an attractive lede and general first impression of the article and as a result, its page view count was over 1,500,000 page views (the view counter got reset) and the article had an impact. For example, ''Ms. Magazine'' cited the article before Richard Dawkins' very public conflicts with feminists that lead to his downfall in popularity and caused a big schism in the [[atheist movement]] which in turn caused the [[Decline of the atheist movement]].  During the time of the atheist movement in terms of its peak, the Conservapedia Richard Dawkins article ranked in the Google top 10 for the term "Richard Dawkins".  

Next time we talk, I will briefly talk to you about how to create a good first general impression for an article and how to get it ranked higher at the search engines. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:19, November 18, 2023 (EST)

Next time we talk, I will briefly talk to you about how to create a good first general impression for an article and how to get it ranked higher at the search engines. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:19, November 18, 2023 (EST)