Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 41:
Line 41: − − == Discourteousness: Hell will freeze over before I become courteous to other editors and stop clogging up Recent Changes with my Essays and triplicate cut n paste [[spam]] from my user space== − − In order to irritate me, RobSmith is insisting that every minor edit I make that I check the minor edit box. − − And if I don't do so, he erases the text on the page and replaces it with the huge graphic like this one here: https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/sandboxfile&oldid=2004042 − − But if you look at RobSmith's edits, he does not super consistently use this box for minor edits. So obviously, he doesn't care about this issue. − − And Andy you don't use the minor edit box super consistently. I don't know of any Conservapedians who do check the minor edit box for minor edits super consistently. And if I use this minor edit box, who am I going to think about but RobSmith which is something I am not going to do anymore. − − To see for yourself, look at: − − *[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Aschlafly Aschlafly contributions] − − *[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/RobSmith RobSmith contributions] − − It's obviously a power play. And a power play I refuse to play along with anymore. When you give an arrogant person an inch, I realize now that they see it as appeasement. Well, that's over. Hell will freeze over before I check the minor edit box. − − RobSmith wants to add a bunch of rules for Conservapedians aren't in the Conservapedia Commandments or Conservapdedia Guidelines. And haven't been a practice for 15 years. − − I will call you about this matter so you can have a chance to straighten things out with RobSmith. − − I would hope that you see things my way and would not put up with this type of harassment to continue. − − Below is the minor big ugly graphic he is putting on my pages. − − [[File:Use the button.PNG|1050px|]] − − I am sure things can be worked out. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:09, November 15, 2023 (EST)
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 04:34, December 23, 2023
, 04:34, December 23, 2023RobSmith and I agreed to delete this stuff
:As to conservative movies being "more successful" - they are so rare, conservatives flock to see it. Again, market demand and market efficiency is at work: the industry has it figured out that they would gross as much money making 1 conservative movie per year (to "fill a niche") vs. making 12 per year over 12 months. And it's more cost efficient (the reduction in recurring production costs coupled with pent-up demand also leaves more marginal investment capital for higher quality in script writing and production value than usual. Hollywood producers recognize the "conservative market" is not an extinct market, so they give them what they want and take conservative consumers money once a year or so). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:15, November 6, 2023 (EST)
:As to conservative movies being "more successful" - they are so rare, conservatives flock to see it. Again, market demand and market efficiency is at work: the industry has it figured out that they would gross as much money making 1 conservative movie per year (to "fill a niche") vs. making 12 per year over 12 months. And it's more cost efficient (the reduction in recurring production costs coupled with pent-up demand also leaves more marginal investment capital for higher quality in script writing and production value than usual. Hollywood producers recognize the "conservative market" is not an extinct market, so they give them what they want and take conservative consumers money once a year or so). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:15, November 6, 2023 (EST)
== Some great news: Search engine traffic is up 25%. Also, the Hollywood values article now ranks #1 at Google. My analysis and the changes I made to the article/website paid off ==
== Some great news: Search engine traffic is up 25%. Also, the Hollywood values article now ranks #1 at Google. My analysis and the changes I made to the article/website paid off ==