Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,683
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − − == Hollywood values == − − If memory serves, Conservapedia used to rank #1 at Google for the term [[Hollywood values]] and as a result it has over 500,000 views. Conservapedia now has its short article [[Hollywood]] ranking in the Google top 10 for this term which is kind of strange. − − Regardless, a ton of work has gone into Conservapedia's article [[Hollywood values]], but somehow it got filled with red links which unfortunately makes an article look unsightly so people are more apt to click off the article faster which reduces an articles search engine ranking. I removed the articles red links so hopefully that pops it back into the Google top 10 ranking. − − Also, one of the things that makes the Hollywood values crowd stand out is their multiple divorces. People kind of scratch their heads why they go through so many spouses. I just created the articles [[Psychological and sociological research about individuals with multiple divorces]] and [[Narcissism and individuals who have had multiple divorces]] and posted links to those articles in a relevant section of the Hollywood values article. − − I will do some analysis later this year and see if there is anything Conservapedia could do to have its Hollywood values article rank in the Google top 10 again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:31, November 6, 2023 (EST) − :By the way, Bing ranks Conservapedia's article [[Hollywood values]] in the Bing top 5 search results. − − :I may give you a quick call this week about something that Conservapedia could do to pop its article into the Google top 10 search results again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:59, November 6, 2023 (EST) − − ::Thanks so much for cleaning up [[Hollywood values]] (#43 among our most popular entries). If only we could clean up [[Hollywood]] industry, then that would be great too!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 14:22, November 6, 2023 (EST) − − :::Your welcome. I created some additional divorce related articles so I was able to expand the article [[Psychological and sociological research about individuals with multiple divorces]]. The deeper they dive into Conservapedia by clicking on internal links related to the Hollywood values article, the higher the [[Hollywood values]] article will potentially rank. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:33, November 6, 2023 (EST) − − ::::It's market demand. The industry is just giving the public what they demand. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 14:37, November 6, 2023 (EST) − − Hollwood is not giving many people in the public what they very much want. − − *Study: "An annual box office study shows that in 2015 American moviegoers still preferred movies with strong conservative content or values over movies with strong liberal or leftist values, by more than 12-to-one. The impact was felt overseas and on home video as well."[https://www.movieguide.org/news-articles/study-moviegoers-prefer-movies-with-conservative-values.html] − − [[Steve Turley]] just cited a 2015 study that conservative movies consistently outperform liberal movies.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMe-PiAWQDI] − − *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMe-PiAWQDI Disney PANICS over Latest WOKE Box Office BOMB!!!], 2023 − − *[https://www.foxnews.com/media/anti-woke-movie-guide-site-gives-conservatives-alternative-rotten-tomatoes Anti-woke movie guide site gives conservatives alternative to 'Rotten Tomatoes'], 2023 − − Older studies: − − *[https://ew.com/article/2012/02/10/conservative-movies-more-profitable/ 'Conservative' movies five times as successful as 'Liberal' movies], − − *[https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/conservative-liberal-movies-politics-profit-study-287816/ Study: ‘Conservative’ Movies Make More Money Than ‘Liberal’ Movies (Exclusive)] − − I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:52, November 6, 2023 (EST) − − :The issue is little different than the Bud Lite/Dylan Mulvaney controversy. Consumers may boycott a movie here and there (Sorcese's ''Passion of Christ'', for example), but the whole industry, or at least one major production and distribution company (like Budweiser; perhaps Netflix) to start with to send the industry a message. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:00, November 6, 2023 (EST) − − :As to conservative movies being "more successful" - they are so rare, conservatives flock to see it. Again, market demand and market efficiency is at work: the industry has it figured out that they would gross as much money making 1 conservative movie per year (to "fill a niche") vs. making 12 per year over 12 months. And it's more cost efficient (the reduction in recurring production costs coupled with pent-up demand also leaves more marginal investment capital for higher quality in script writing and production value than usual. Hollywood producers recognize the "conservative market" is not an extinct market, so they give them what they want and take conservative consumers money once a year or so). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:15, November 6, 2023 (EST) − − == Some great news: Search engine traffic is up 25%. Also, the Hollywood values article now ranks #1 at Google. My analysis and the changes I made to the article/website paid off == − − I have some great news. Google referral traffic to Conservapedia is up about 25% according to the leading web marketing company SEMRush. − − And remember how I told you that Conservapedia no longer ranks in the Google top 10 for the search "[[Hollywood values]]"? − − Well after I did my on-page analysis and optimization for the article and made the changes that I thought should be done, the [[Hollywood values]] article ranks #1 at Google for the term Hollywood values. What I did was to improve how the article looked plus I created a bunch of complementary articles on multiple divorces (Hollywood entertainers often have multiple divorces) which causes some people to dive into the Conservapedia website deeper. − − And I am sure that other things can be done to increase search engine traffic too. I plan on having access to some great web marketing tools in the future, but my initial analysis and implementation was very successful from the time and return on investment point of view. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:47, November 15, 2023 (EST) − :I am continuing to optimize the Hollywood values article so it has "sticking power" in terms of better keeping its #1 Google ranking. I am ramping up some things in my off-wiki life, but I will try to get in contact with you as soon as I can. The purpose of my call will be to have Conservapedia continue to gain search engine traffic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:01, November 15, 2023 (EST) − ::I made some additional progress as far as optimizing the Hollywood values article. I came up with a strategy on how to best do this. Next time we talk, I will fill you in about this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:52, November 17, 2023 (EST) − − == About the pro bono web marketing work I am doing for Conservapedia == − − As you know, I do web marketing work for nonprofit websites and as a result they receive millions of extra page views. Some of the work I have done has been cited by a web marketing agency that I have no connections to. − − Presently, I am doing some pro bono work for Conservapedia and there is something that is impeding my work. The pro bono work I am doing is for the Conservapedia article [[Hollywood values]] which I recently got ranked #1 at Google for this search. Presently, the article has over 500,000 page views and it is one of your favorite Conservapedia articles. − − Also, I came up with a way that the "[[Sex and drugs and rock and roll]]" aspect of the [[Hollywood values]] article (which is a very small portion of the article) can still be incorporated into the article. And the icing on the cake is that it will further enhance the "stickability" of Conservapedia's search engine ranking so Conservapedia will retain its current ranking longer. − − Unfortunately, there is something that is hindering my pro bono SEO work for Conservapedia. If this problem persists, next time we talk, I will discuss this with you. The good news is that this can be easily fixed with no extra effort on your part or on the part of Conservapedians. I just need your cooperation on this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:28, November 18, 2023 (EST) − − == Improving the web traffic and impact of key Conservapedia articles == − − Because people judge a book by its cover, the lede of an article and its general first appearance are very important. By general first appearance, I mean the first 1-3 seconds a web visitor is on the particilar page. If the lede and general first appearance of a Conservapedia article is not good, its general traffic will suffer, time spent on the page will suffer, its search engine ranking for various terms terms will suffer and its shares on social media will suffer. In short, a bad first impression will cause people to quickly click of the page and not read the article plus other user engagement stats and other web marketing stats will suffer. Bottom line: Few people will read the article and it will have little to no impact on society. − − Also, beauty/esthetics matter when it comes to web articles and other matters in life. And that is why smart urban planners and architects design beautiful cities/buildings that elevate a city and bring in tourists. Its also why guys get haircuts and women shave their legs if they want to gets dates and better keep their spouses/girlfriends/boyfriends. − − '''Key examples:''' − − '''1.''' With the above in mind, take a look at present day version of this article: [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]. Compare that with the March 10, 2019 version of the article which is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez&oldid=1500524 HERE]. − − '''2.''' Next, in terms of a first impressions (namely the first 1-3 seconds), take a look at the [[Joe Biden]] article. Now compare it with the December 28, 2021 version of the Joe Biden article which is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Biden&oldid=1826710 HERE] and the May 26, 2021 version of the article which is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Biden&oldid=1760432 HERE]. − − '''3.''' Next, in terms of first impressions (namely the first 1-3 seconds), take a look at Conservapedia's [[Volodymyr Zelensky]] article. Now look at Wikipedia's Volodymyr Zelensky article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volodymyr_Zelenskyy HERE]. Which article has a better first impression (the first 1-3 seconds of seeing an article)? By the way, I am no fan of Volodymyr Zelensky and think he is a corrupt, authoritarian and foolish leader. − − '''4.''' Next, look at Conservapedia's [[Ukraine]] article. Next, look at the August 25, 2023 version of Conservapedia's Ukraine article [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ukraine&oldid=1974900 HERE]. Which version of the article gives a better general first impression (First 1-3 seconds of looking at the article)? − − As you are aware, I am no fan of [[Richard Dawkins]]. Despite this, I designed an attractive lede and general first impression of the article and as a result, its page view count was over 1,500,000 page views (the view counter got reset) and the article had an impact. For example, ''Ms. Magazine'' cited the article before Richard Dawkins' very public conflicts with feminists that lead to his downfall in popularity and caused a big schism in the [[atheist movement]] which in turn caused the [[Decline of the atheist movement]]. During the time of the atheist movement in terms of its peak, the Conservapedia Richard Dawkins article ranked in the Google top 10 for the term "Richard Dawkins". − − Next time we talk, I will briefly talk to you about how to create a good first general impression for an article and how to get it ranked higher at the search engines. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:19, November 18, 2023 (EST) − − :Sounds great. We heard it all before. Now tell us why you were a fan of giving away $150 billion to a corrupt authoritarian leader? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]</sup> 17:56, November 18, 2023 (EST) − ::Andy, setting aside the fact that I don't wrestle with pigs in the mud or fling poo at monkeys who fling poo at me, I look forward to talking to you soon. And I hope you don't put too much hope in someone who obviously has challenges when it comes to creating good article ledes or creating an article which gives a first good impression. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:27, November 18, 2023 (EST) − :::The other thing that I am going to mention to you is the following two key points: '''1)''' If the general tone and wording of a web article appears to be written by someone with a lot of anger/hate, it will be a big turn off to readers and they will quickly click off an article. '''2)''' If the article has intentional falsehoods or a great deal of spin so that it violates the [[fallacy of exclusion]] (not dealing with significant counter arguments/evidence), many people will quickly clickly off the page. As a lawyer, I am sure that you are aware that lawyers who ignore the key evidence that opposing counsel brings forth, often lose cases. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:53, November 18, 2023 (EST) − − ::::Okay, why don't you help us recruit some editors of varying viewpoints to work cooperatively with? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]</sup> 19:06, November 18, 2023 (EST) − − == Increasing traffic and editors == − − While I was taking a walk this evening, I thought about Conservapedia increasing or maintaining its web traffic. − − With that in mind, below is what I came up with: − − '''1.''' Andy can decide what he desires as far as Conservapedia either maintaining or increasing its web traffic. Of course, this will incorporate: how Andy and/or DavidB4 will fix the program Guard dog and whether or not the log on problem and caching issues will be fixed. − − '''2.''' RobSmith, Andy and other Conservapedians will decide if they are going to go on a editor recruitment drive and what they are going to do if they were to go on a editor recruitment drive. − − '''3.''' RobSmith, other editors and Andy, can either create content with no particular plan or create individual/collective content production plans. − − '''4.''' For the next 24 months, the web traffic level of Conservapedia can be looked at every 6 months using: Andy's internal traffic logs; [https://hypestat.com/info/conservapedia.com Conservapedia's Hyperstat ranking], and [https://www.similarweb.com/website/conservapedia.com/#overview Similarweb.com - Conservapedia]. In addition, I can provide SEO data from SEMRush.com plus I have some other data at my disposal. The traffic stats will be tracked at: [[User: Conservative/Conservapedia traffic stats]] − − '''5.''' Due to some off wiki goals, my involvement with Conservapedia in the next 24 months will be very minimal and consists solely of some SEO tweaks to the [[Hollywood values]] article and perhaps a few other articles (I may or may not do a some user space edits too). So the SEO traffic or other traffic as a result of my efforts will be very negligible to none. − − '''6.''' At the end of the 24 months, Andy and any other Conservapedians who are interested can decide what worked and/or did not work and I can assist Conservapedia with a plan on moving forward should such a plan be desired. − − '''Current Conservapedia traffic stats and web marketing stats:''' − − [[File:Hypestat Conservapedia on 11-19-2023.jpg|thumbnail|1200px|center]] − {{clear}} − [[File:Other hypestat stats 11-19-2023.jpg|thumbnail|1200px|center]] − {{clear}} − [[File:Conservapedia - Similarweb October 2023.jpg|thumbnail|1200px|center]] − {{Clear}} − [[File:SEMRush data 11-19-2023.jpg|thumbnail|1200px|center]] − {{Clear}} − <br /> − <br /> − I look forward to talking to you at the 6 month intervals and at the end of the 24 months. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:16, November 19, 2023 (EST) − − − − :There's more. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 14:09, December 7, 2023 (EST) − − ::Few of these Essays contain original content. Most all are cut n paste mish mash, rehashed content from other Essays, with a new title intented to denigrate or outrage. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 14:17, December 7, 2023 (EST) − − ::All I know is, if User:Conservative were not an Admin, Conservapedia would not allow any other editor, on any subject, to do the same thing User:Conservative does - use cut n paste spam rearranged with a new Essay title for the sole purpose of attacking and criticizing his personal internet "enemies". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 14:32, December 7, 2023 (EST) − {{warning collapse|reason=off topic, deflection|content= − :::Actually, despite Conservapedia having a very poor quasi ambassador for Russia with very bad diplomatic skills, I plan on visiting [[Saint Petersburg]] down the pike. St. Petersberg is the [https://www.citiesabc.com/city/saint-petersburg/ fourth most populous city in "Europe"] and it has some beautiful architecture. My Russian-American hairdresser is a much better spokesperson for Russia than RobSmith. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:59, December 7, 2023 (EST) − − ::::You are just trolling now and not addressing specific problems. That is not "civil discussion". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 15:03, December 7, 2023 (EST) − − Actually, you are a very bad spokeperson for Russia. I now frequent the pro-Russia [[The Duran]] YouTube far less frequently and visit the Russia Today website less frequently too as a result of your recent spamming on my user talk page and other egregious behavior. Congratulations "Mr. Ambassador". − − And you are horrible at featuring Russia's best attributes. For example, Conservapedia's Saint Petersburg page has zero pictures of that beautiful city. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:30, December 7, 2023 (EST) − :More trolling. I never elevated myself to be a "spokesperson for Russia". − − :Also, please follow the rules for civility and indent your postings properly. I have the documentary evidence from multiple instances of you vandalizing talk pages and attempting to change the context of discussions by not indenting properly. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 15:35, December 7, 2023 (EST) − }} − − == Prevalence of homosexuality going down in cultures that become more conservative == − − I wrote a new article that you might be interested in: [[Prevalence of homosexuality going down in cultures that become more conservative]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:24, December 8, 2023 (EST) − − == Two new essays dealing with the future of the homosexual agenda in the USA, UK and the Western World == − − I created two essays dealing with the future of the homosexual agenda in the USA, UK and the Western World which are given below: − − *[[Essay: How gay is the UK and how gay will it be in the latter part of the 21st century and beyond?|How gay is the UK and how gay will it be in the latter part of the 21st century and beyond?]] − − *[[Essay: How gay is the West and how lasting is homosexuality in a society?|How gay is the West and how lasting is homosexuality in a society?]] − − [[File:Amish young woman wearing a bonnet.jpg|center|thumbnail|300px|This [[Amish]] young woman in Pennsylvania displaying some freshly baked soft pretzels is definitely not wearing an [[LGBTQ]] pin on her apron. ]] − {{Clear}} − − '''Attention all Western gay activists:''' Say goodbye to your precious and very fleeting gayness in the Western World! Anti-homosexuality sentiments and Jesus are coming! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:07, December 8, 2023 (EST) − − == Greg Abbott and Israel == − − Hey, Andy. I follow the Greg Abbott page, and I've noticed that the last two edits you made to it (which were not back to back) both concern Abbott's ties to pro-Israel donors. With this in mind, I'm curious to know. Have you soured on Israel, like I have?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:14, December 10, 2023 (EST) − :Perhaps the question should be divided between being pro-Israel and pro-Zionist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 00:05, December 11, 2023 (EST) − − ::I was asked by a Conservapedia administrator to write about the Gaza/Hamas/Israel situation. As a result, I wrote this essay: [[Essay: Israel's efficient mobilization of soldiers vs. Russia's far less efficient mobilization of soldiers related to the war in Ukraine|Israel's efficient mobilization of soldiers vs. Russia's far less efficient mobilization of soldiers related to the war in Ukraine]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:33, December 13, 2023 (EST) − − :::It's outdated already. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 18:04, December 13, 2023 (EST) − − :::War is a living laboratory, an ongoing process, minute-by-minute to come up with solutions to immediate, ongoing threats. For example, how to defend against a $150 drone with night vision and facial recognition technology that is capable of killing a man or blowing up a $10 million tank. The first side that comes up with the solution then is copied by the other side, and eventually all militaries of the world. The war that is fought in Ukraine today is not the same war that was fought in 2022, or even six months ago. Javelins, M777 Howitzers, Leopard tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, etc etc have all proven useless, so they are hardly even seen at the front today. − − :::Two months ago when the Hamas war started, there was little evidence that the Israeli armed forces incorporated anything from the lessons learned by the largest, most successful modern fighting forces on the planet today. Israel's recent success has been gained by learning what they can from the Russians' recent success, and abandoning the NATO training and tactics that proved disastrous to the Ukraine armed forces. − − :::This Essay, ''prima facia'' is flawed in its basic premise. And obviously is written by someone who has been propagandized and brainwashed, and would prove deadly to anybody relying on it for valid information. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 19:35, December 13, 2023 (EST) − − :::[https://www.bitchute.com/video/cCws1psWVVsx/ The face of modern warfare]. The quicker you master these methods, or figure out a solution to defend against it, the more successful you will be. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 19:55, December 13, 2023 (EST) − − I didn’t realize until now that it was Andy who added the Main Page note commending the two Republicans who voted against aid to Israel. So it’s obvious at this point that he has indeed soured on Israel, like I have. Good. With that said, perhaps it is high time that editors respect his apparent wishes and overhaul foreign policy pages to make them somewhat harsher on Israel. But to what extent? We cannot afford to give readers the impression that we condone anti-Semitism, which unfortunately has become all too common among critics of Israel these days.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 14:01, December 17, 2023 (EST) − ::Well, we know where [[Dennis Prager]] stands: [https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/12/12/dennis-prager-yes-anti-zionism-is-antisemitism-1419236/ Yes, anti-Zionism Is antisemitism]. In a way he reminds me of [https://archive.is/ncyoi Susan Estrich]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 21:24, December 17, 2023 (EST) − − :Israel can now survive without USA financial aid.[https://archive.ph/5RFzf] Since its a cost/benefit decision, here is what the USA gets from Israel: [https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/friends-benefits-why-us-israeli-alliance-good-america Friends with Benefits: Why the U.S.-Israeli Alliance Is Good for America] (For example, Israel prevented the further proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the region by thwarting Iraq and Syria's nuclear programs). Some of the radical Islamacists like the ones in Iran intensely hate the USA partly because it supports Israel so that is a downside/cost over and above the financial cost. And Israel is not popular among many countries as evidenced by various UN votes - especially with the recent events in Gaza (But for brevities sake, I won't go into the various details of the complex Gaza issue involving Hamas, Gazans and Israel). − − :According to an Arab pro-Islam website: "Islam has been mobilised as an explanatory vector, creating the discourse of Muslims as barbarians by power elites in both the Global South and the West."[https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/how-western-islamophobia-works-global-south] Setting aside whether that is accurate, post 9-11 and various instances of Islamic terrorism around the world, it wouldn't surprise me if non-Islamic global south countries have a lot of citizens who are not fond of Islam. In the West, there is a lot of anti-pathy towards Islam - especially among right-wing populists. − − :Some people take the position that the Jews are God's chosen people and support Israel for that reason. And they often quote biblical prophecy like the Jews being scattered across the world, coming back to Israel, reclaiming their nation/country and making the desert bloom again which is a fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy.[https://web.archive.org/web/20100326023446/http://sciencespeaks.dstoner.net/Prophetic_Accuracy.html][http://www.aboutbibleprophecy.com/timeline.htm] − − :But the bottom line is that the pro-Israel lobby is super strong in the USA so USA policy towards Israel is not going to change anytime soon. In addition, if Trump wins, he is very pro-Israel. For example, he moved the USA embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, his administration successfully negotiated the Abrahamic Accords, etc. (In addition, Trump has Jewish in-laws). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:33, December 17, 2023 (EST) − − == Conservapedia content and the swing states == − − In a recent phone discussion, we discussed the importance of swing states on the future of American politics. − − I gathered the below statistics: − − *AZ - 33.33% GOP; 29.76% Democrat − *GA - 49.2% GOP; 49.5% Democrat − *WI - 48.8% GOP; 49.4% Democrat − *NV - 47.7% GOP; 50.1% Democrat − − If you want to make Conservapedia more impactful, created/expand the articles on the political parties, office holders and candidates in those states. − − In addition, I would create articles on [[Politics in Arizona]], [[Politics in Georgia]], [[Politics in Wisconsin]], [[Politics in Nevada]], etc. − − And I would encourage Conservapedians to learn various skills helpful to politics and to get involved in the politics of those states. It could potentially supplement their income plus help shape the future of politics in the USA. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:06, December 17, 2023 (EST)
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 06:41, December 23, 2023
, 06:41, December 23, 2023Archiving
<center>''Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other [[trolling]] content at [[Conservapedia:User complaints]]. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.''</center>
<center>''Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other [[trolling]] content at [[Conservapedia:User complaints]]. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.''</center>