Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
→Liberal panic: The liberal Justices opened their rebuke of the majority opinion with a quote of Roberts' from a prior concurrence by him in the ''Dobbs'' case, which is further evidence that Roberts' was the author of the unsigned majority opinion by
== Liberal panic ==
== Liberal panic ==
The liberal Justices, led by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], are typically savvy in trying to bring Chief Justice Roberts and another [[conservative]], who in this context would be Justice [[Amy Coney Barrett]], over to the Left side. But the liberal bloc apparently feels that Roberts will rule on the side of [[Trump]] unless there is public criticism, and the liberal bloc started that process with a concurring opinion that rebuked Roberts' majority (per curiam) opinion.
The liberal Justices, led by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], are typically savvy in trying to bring Chief Justice Roberts and another [[conservative]], who in this context would be Justice [[Amy Coney Barrett]], over to the Left side. But the liberal bloc apparently feels that Roberts will rule on the side of [[Trump]] unless there is public criticism, and the liberal bloc started that process with a concurring opinion that rebuked Roberts' majority (per curiam) opinion.
The liberal Justices opened their rebuke of the majority opinion with a quote of Roberts' from a prior concurrence by him in the ''Dobbs'' case, which is further evidence that Roberts' was the author of the unsigned majority opinion by the Court.
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]