Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − +
no edit summary
The liberal Justices, led by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], are typically savvy in trying to bring Chief Justice Roberts and another [[conservative]], who in this context would be Justice [[Amy Coney Barrett]], over to the Left side. But the liberal bloc apparently feels that Roberts will rule on the side of [[Trump]] unless there is public criticism, and the liberal bloc started that process with a concurring opinion that rebuked Roberts' majority (per curiam) opinion.
The liberal Justices, led by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], are typically savvy in trying to bring Chief Justice Roberts and another [[conservative]], who in this context would be Justice [[Amy Coney Barrett]], over to the Left side. But the liberal bloc apparently feels that Roberts will rule on the side of [[Trump]] unless there is public criticism, and the liberal bloc started that process with a concurring opinion that rebuked Roberts' majority (per curiam) opinion.
The liberal Justices opened their rebuke of the majority opinion with a quote of Roberts' from a prior concurrence by him in the ''Dobbs'' case, which is further evidence that Roberts' was the author of the unsigned majority opinion by the Court.
The liberal Justices opened their rebuke of the majority opinion with a quote of Roberts' from a prior concurrence by him in the ''[[Dobbs]]'' case, which is further evidence that Roberts' was the author of the unsigned majority opinion by the Court.
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]