| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | '''Ukraine aid''', also known as the '''Slava Slush Fund''' was formally introduced into the Senate as S. 3522, the '''Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022''' on January 19, 2022, more than 5 weeks before the Russian intervention in the 8-year ongoing [[Donbas war]].<ref>Introduced in Senate (01/19/2022) Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/3522/summary/00</ref> | | '''Ukraine aid''', also known as the '''Slava Slush Fund''' was formally introduced into the Senate as S. 3522, the '''Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022''' on January 19, 2022, more than 5 weeks before the Russian intervention in the 8-year ongoing [[Donbas war]].<ref>Introduced in Senate (01/19/2022) Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/3522/summary/00</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | 57 [[House]] members -- all Republican -- voted against the initial $40 Billion provocation to prolong the 8-year ongoing [[Donbas war|Donbas civil conflict]], bill, HR 7691.<ref>https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2022/05/10/168/78/CREC-2022-05-10-pt1-PgH4775.pdf</ref> | + | 57 [[House]] members -- all Republican -- voted against the initial $40 billion provocation to prolong the 8-year ongoing [[Donbas war|Donbas civil conflict]], bill, HR 7691.<ref>https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2022/05/10/168/78/CREC-2022-05-10-pt1-PgH4775.pdf</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | By May 2023, the Congress provided about $116 billion, nearly twice the [[CIA]] estimated Russian defense budget. By September 2023, the entire U.S. investment had been destroyed on the battlefield. | + | By May 2023, the Congress provided about $116 billion,<ref>[https://www.crfb.org/blogs/congress-approved-113-billion-aid-ukraine-2022 Congress Approved $113 Billion of Aid to Ukraine in 2022], Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, JAN 5, 2023. www.crfb.org</ref> nearly twice the [[CIA]] estimated Russian defense budget. By September 2023, the entire U.S. investment had been destroyed on the battlefield. |
| | | | |
| | The bill pays the salaries and pensions of Ukrainian government officials, effectively making Ukraine a U.S. [[colonialism|colony]]. The United States would have to borrow the $40 billion from the [[Peoples Republic of China]] in order to fund the bill.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/rand-paul-was-right-to-insist-on-fiscal-accountability-for-ukrainian-aid-bill</ref> The amount of funding was enough to guarantee, even after the demilitarization of Ukraine, defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the battlefield, capture of the capital city of [[Kyiv]] and fall of the [[Kyiv regime]], to continue a terrorist partisan insurgency in Russian held areas and a [[hybrid war]] into the [[Russian Federation]] itself for several years into the future. | | The bill pays the salaries and pensions of Ukrainian government officials, effectively making Ukraine a U.S. [[colonialism|colony]]. The United States would have to borrow the $40 billion from the [[Peoples Republic of China]] in order to fund the bill.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/rand-paul-was-right-to-insist-on-fiscal-accountability-for-ukrainian-aid-bill</ref> The amount of funding was enough to guarantee, even after the demilitarization of Ukraine, defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the battlefield, capture of the capital city of [[Kyiv]] and fall of the [[Kyiv regime]], to continue a terrorist partisan insurgency in Russian held areas and a [[hybrid war]] into the [[Russian Federation]] itself for several years into the future. |