Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: − +
→Mark Steyn appeals hockey stick verdict: It turns out that Steyn wasn't happy with my description of the alleged libel,
[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/03/mark_steyn_appeals_hockey_stick_verdict.html Here is my latest on the ''American Thinker'']."
[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/03/mark_steyn_appeals_hockey_stick_verdict.html Here is my latest on the ''American Thinker'']."
It turn out Steyn wasn't happy with my description of the alleged libel, so that part of the article has been dropped. The "corrected" version just says that it was an "opinion" and therefore protected free speech, which I suppose is what matters legally. Various news reports in the corporate media do detail what Steyn wrote. If what Steyn wrote is libelous, then to quote it is also libelous. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:15, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
It turns out that Steyn wasn't happy with my description of the alleged libel, so that part of the article has been dropped. The "corrected" version just says that it was Steyn's "opinion" and was therefore protected free speech, which I suppose is what matters legally. Various news reports in the corporate media do detail what Steyn wrote. If what Steyn wrote is libelous, then to quote it is also libelous. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:15, March 17, 2024 (EDT)