It turns out that Steyn wasn't happy with my description of the alleged libel, so that part of the article has been dropped. The "corrected" version just says that the offending material was Steyn's "opinion" and was therefore protected free speech. I suppose that is the part that matters legally. [https://apnews.com/article/climate-change-defamation-michael-mann-penn-state-61289ee2d8d2143768d28995c83899ef Various news reports do include the quote that offended Mann so much]. That would seem to be a contradiction. If what Steyn wrote was libelous, which is what the MSM claims, then to quote it was also libelous. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:15, March 17, 2024 (EDT) | It turns out that Steyn wasn't happy with my description of the alleged libel, so that part of the article has been dropped. The "corrected" version just says that the offending material was Steyn's "opinion" and was therefore protected free speech. I suppose that is the part that matters legally. [https://apnews.com/article/climate-change-defamation-michael-mann-penn-state-61289ee2d8d2143768d28995c83899ef Various news reports do include the quote that offended Mann so much]. That would seem to be a contradiction. If what Steyn wrote was libelous, which is what the MSM claims, then to quote it was also libelous. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:15, March 17, 2024 (EDT) |