Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,521
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,934:
Line 1,934: + +
(edit summary removed)
::::That's the problem. Andy agrees, the if I spammed to two dozen user talk pages, ==User:Conservatve is a girly man== which basically is the same thing that User:Conserative did and has done repeatedly for years, we'd have a problem. Would you, as an Admin, allow 2 dozen non-Admins to do that to each other day and night?
::::That's the problem. Andy agrees, the if I spammed to two dozen user talk pages, ==User:Conservatve is a girly man== which basically is the same thing that User:Conserative did and has done repeatedly for years, we'd have a problem. Would you, as an Admin, allow 2 dozen non-Admins to do that to each other day and night?
::::As a policy matter, can you identify the specific problem here? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 14:17, March 27, 2024 (EDT)
::::As a policy matter, can you identify the specific problem here? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 14:17, March 27, 2024 (EDT)
:::::Yes, the policy issue is quite clear. Specifically, that is officially not my problem; it is not the job of admins to police and punish other admins. That it the job of the "Bureaucrats." According to CP policy, admins are considered equals, meaning admin1 has no authority over admin2. Suggestions and requests can be made as peers, but enforcement is out of scope. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 14:41, March 27, 2024 (EDT)
== Sorry about that. ==
== Sorry about that. ==