| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| | *[[Liberals]] use the euphemistic term "groping" to refer to molesting done by other liberals, but insist on referring to it with the highly pejorative term "molesting" if alleged against a [[conservative]]. | | *[[Liberals]] use the euphemistic term "groping" to refer to molesting done by other liberals, but insist on referring to it with the highly pejorative term "molesting" if alleged against a [[conservative]]. |
| | *[[Obama]] did nothing for 8 years about the immense environmental harm caused by the cultivation of plants for [[marijuana]] production, and both environmental groups and liberal politicians say and do almost nothing to object to the environmental damage. | | *[[Obama]] did nothing for 8 years about the immense environmental harm caused by the cultivation of plants for [[marijuana]] production, and both environmental groups and liberal politicians say and do almost nothing to object to the environmental damage. |
| − | *[[Liberals]] encouraged [[Al Gore]] to refuse to accept the election result in 2000, but then harshly criticizing [[Donald Trump]] for merely implying that he might not accept the election result in 2016 depending on whether wrongdoing occurs. | + | *[[Liberals]] encouraged [[Al Gore]] to refuse to accept the election result in 2000, but then harshly criticized [[Donald Trump]] for merely implying that he might not accept the election result in 2016 depending on whether wrongdoing occurs. |
| | *[[Bill Clinton]]'s sexual misconduct was no problem at all to [[liberals]], who then attempt to destroy [[Donald Trump]] based on mere allegations far less severe. | | *[[Bill Clinton]]'s sexual misconduct was no problem at all to [[liberals]], who then attempt to destroy [[Donald Trump]] based on mere allegations far less severe. |
| | *a [[Dem]] like [[Tim Kaine]] can be rude to a woman moderator without a political backlash, but media fury would rain down on any [[conservative]] who might act that way. | | *a [[Dem]] like [[Tim Kaine]] can be rude to a woman moderator without a political backlash, but media fury would rain down on any [[conservative]] who might act that way. |
| Line 32: |
Line 32: |
| | *believe what is taught by liberals in school before believing what is taught in the [[Bible]] | | *believe what is taught by liberals in school before believing what is taught in the [[Bible]] |
| | *hold grudges against others who acted no worse than one's friends | | *hold grudges against others who acted no worse than one's friends |
| − | *disparage voters when liberals lose, but act like majority vote means something special when liberals win | + | *disparage voters when liberals lose, but act like the majority vote means something special when liberals win |
| | *immediately believe anything that is contrary to the Bible, yet reject numerous counterexamples to liberal theories | | *immediately believe anything that is contrary to the Bible, yet reject numerous counterexamples to liberal theories |
| | *question the truth of what conservatives say, while rejecting any questions about the truth of the [[Democrat]] claim that [[Obama]] is a [[Christian]] | | *question the truth of what conservatives say, while rejecting any questions about the truth of the [[Democrat]] claim that [[Obama]] is a [[Christian]] |
| Line 53: |
Line 53: |
| | *Wealth by a liberal, such as the tens of millions of dollars made by [[Al Gore]], [[John Kerry]], and [[Bill Clinton]], is just fine; but wealth by a [[Christian]] preacher or Republican politician such as [[Mitt Romney]] is somehow unacceptable. | | *Wealth by a liberal, such as the tens of millions of dollars made by [[Al Gore]], [[John Kerry]], and [[Bill Clinton]], is just fine; but wealth by a [[Christian]] preacher or Republican politician such as [[Mitt Romney]] is somehow unacceptable. |
| | | | |
| − | *[[Global warming]]: Supporters of the [[Kyoto Protocol]] (an emissions reduction treaty) say that "[[correlation is not causation]]" when scientists point out the dozens of natural [[climate cycles]] linking changes in sunspots to changes in Earth's air temperature. But their argument for a [[runaway greenhouse effect]] is based on a single period from 1850 to present in which carbon dioxide levels and air temperatures have risen together. | + | *[[Global warming]]: Supporters of the [[Kyoto Protocol]] (an emissions reduction treaty) say that "[[correlation is not causation]]" when scientists point out the dozens of natural [[climate cycles]] linking changes in sunspots to changes in Earth's air temperature. But their argument for a [[runaway greenhouse effect]] is based on a single period from 1850 to the present in which carbon dioxide levels and air temperatures have risen together. |
| | | | |
| | *[[Evolution]]: Ardent supporters of the Theory of Evolution blindly accept any study that purportedly "proves" their theory, without addressing (or even allowing the criticism of) any flaws in such studies. But when it comes to alternative theories (whether it be [[Creationism]], intelligent design, or something else), the same people immediately reject them without even studying the details. | | *[[Evolution]]: Ardent supporters of the Theory of Evolution blindly accept any study that purportedly "proves" their theory, without addressing (or even allowing the criticism of) any flaws in such studies. But when it comes to alternative theories (whether it be [[Creationism]], intelligent design, or something else), the same people immediately reject them without even studying the details. |