Andy, it's amusing that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_American_Bible&diff=prev&oldid=681062 you are chiding] the "New American Bible" for its use of an awkward [[compound negative]] in Mark 6:4 (Οὐκ ἔστιν προφήτης ἄτιμος εἰ μὴ ἐν τῇ πατρίδι αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐν τοῖς συγγενεῦσιν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ αὐτοῦ), when the [[CBP]] uses exactly the same translation for the parallel verse in Matthew 13:57 (Οὐκ ἔστιν προφήτης ἄτιμος εἰ μὴ ἐν τῇ πατρίδι καὶ ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ αὐτοῦ)! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:18, 18 February 2015 (EST) | Andy, it's amusing that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_American_Bible&diff=prev&oldid=681062 you are chiding] the "New American Bible" for its use of an awkward [[compound negative]] in Mark 6:4 (Οὐκ ἔστιν προφήτης ἄτιμος εἰ μὴ ἐν τῇ πατρίδι αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐν τοῖς συγγενεῦσιν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ αὐτοῦ), when the [[CBP]] uses exactly the same translation for the parallel verse in Matthew 13:57 (Οὐκ ἔστιν προφήτης ἄτιμος εἰ μὴ ἐν τῇ πατρίδι καὶ ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ αὐτοῦ)! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:18, 18 February 2015 (EST) |