Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + + +
Talk:New American Bible (view source)
Revision as of 10:18, February 18, 2015
, 10:18, February 18, 2015→Awkward compound negative in the CBP: new section
::: Unfortunately, this is not an isolated example. Numerous atrocious translations in key passages in this translations, passages that are heavily used in official church readings, suggest real problems with this translation effort. This really does cry out for an explanation of what happened. (I'm not blaming you for this!)--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:31, 29 March 2009 (EDT)
::: Unfortunately, this is not an isolated example. Numerous atrocious translations in key passages in this translations, passages that are heavily used in official church readings, suggest real problems with this translation effort. This really does cry out for an explanation of what happened. (I'm not blaming you for this!)--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:31, 29 March 2009 (EDT)
== Awkward [[compound negative]] in the [[CBP]] ==
Andy, it's amusing that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_American_Bible&diff=prev&oldid=681062 you are chiding] the "New American Bible" for its use of an awkward [[compound negative]] in Mark 6:4 (Οὐκ ἔστιν προφήτης ἄτιμος εἰ μὴ ἐν τῇ πατρίδι αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐν τοῖς συγγενεῦσιν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ αὐτοῦ), when the [[CBP]] uses exactly the same translation for the parallel verse in Matthew 13:57 (Οὐκ ἔστιν προφήτης ἄτιμος εἰ μὴ ἐν τῇ πατρίδι καὶ ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ αὐτοῦ)! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:18, 18 February 2015 (EST)