Changes

"[https://archive.is/bewm5#selection-4539.0-4539.50 Michelle Obama Absolutely Takes Apart Donald Trump]," according to the ''New York Times.'' Trump isn't qualified to be president because his wealth was inherited, according to Michelle. Its hard to take this argument seriously. The Dems were fine with inherited wealth when it was Kennedys and Rockefellers doing the inheriting. More to the point, the Obamas' wealth of $70 million is based on political connections and affirmative action. [https://www.homesandgardens.com/news/president-obama-new-house-marthas-vineyard The Obama compound on Martha's Vinyard is just one of their many houses]. [https://www.gobankingrates.com/net-worth/politicians/barack-obama-net-worth/ As a state senator in 2004, his net worth was between $100,000 and $200,000]. Money is fine, as long its from graft and not family? Its a reversal of the traditional attitude on this subject. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 00:28, August 22, 2024 (EDT)

"[https://archive.is/bewm5#selection-4539.0-4539.50 Michelle Obama Absolutely Takes Apart Donald Trump]," according to the ''New York Times.'' Trump isn't qualified to be president because his wealth was inherited, according to Michelle. Its hard to take this argument seriously. The Dems were fine with inherited wealth when it was Kennedys and Rockefellers doing the inheriting. More to the point, the Obamas' wealth of $70 million is based on political connections and affirmative action. [https://www.homesandgardens.com/news/president-obama-new-house-marthas-vineyard The Obama compound on Martha's Vinyard is just one of their many houses]. [https://www.gobankingrates.com/net-worth/politicians/barack-obama-net-worth/ As a state senator in 2004, his net worth was between $100,000 and $200,000]. Money is fine, as long its from graft and not family? Its a reversal of the traditional attitude on this subject. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 00:28, August 22, 2024 (EDT)

:Right, [[Michelle Obama]]'s argument is absurd [[liberal claptrap]] that doesn't persuade any voters. It was a wasted opportunity for the [[Democrat National Convention]] to feature this [[liberal]] [[double standard]] in prime time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:24, August 22, 2024 (EDT)

:Right, [[Michelle Obama]]'s argument is absurd [[liberal claptrap]] that doesn't persuade any voters. It was a wasted opportunity for the [[Democrat National Convention]] to feature this [[liberal]] [[double standard]] in prime time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:24, August 22, 2024 (EDT)