Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 769:
Line 769: + + + + + +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 18:20, June 25, 2007
, 18:20, June 25, 2007urban heat island
*Yes. See the info I just inserted above....very telling. I wonder how many measuring stations in London, Madrid, Rio and the like have the same conditions? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 14:15, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
*Yes. See the info I just inserted above....very telling. I wonder how many measuring stations in London, Madrid, Rio and the like have the same conditions? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 14:15, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
::According to liberals (and Kyoto Protocol supporters) the [[Urban heat island effect]] is of little significance and has been properly accounted for.
::According to scientists, the 5 degree rise of Atlanta has ''not'' been accounted for. There's also a trend in California.
::The "contamination" of the [[temperature record]] rivals the supposed "human contribution" - but it can't explain it all away. Only liberals (and other cheaters) would dare to make a claim like that (see [[hockey stick graph]]). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:20, 25 June 2007 (EDT)