Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 775:
Line 775: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 18:48, June 25, 2007
, 18:48, June 25, 2007Let's be clear - or say nothing
::The "contamination" of the [[temperature record]] rivals the supposed "human contribution" - but it can't explain it all away. Only liberals (and other cheaters) would dare to make a claim like that (see [[hockey stick graph]]). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:20, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
::The "contamination" of the [[temperature record]] rivals the supposed "human contribution" - but it can't explain it all away. Only liberals (and other cheaters) would dare to make a claim like that (see [[hockey stick graph]]). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:20, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
==Politics of global warming==
Cut from article:
: and to some the warming appears to be related to increases in [[carbon dioxide]] and other greenhouse gases. The possibility of adverse consequences has become a major concern for environmentalists.
Does it "appear so to them", or are they making a claim whose scientific accuracy they don't know or care about?
And do environmentalists actually believe their own claims, or do they promote their alarmism for ulterior motives? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:48, 25 June 2007 (EDT)