60
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 497:
Line 497: + +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 00:40, June 27, 2007
, 00:40, June 27, 2007no edit summary
::Sorry, i don't quite understand what you mean? i see you reverted the deletion, but why? As said, there was no citation to the "study" and even if there where one, it would be 18 years old, IPCC was found in 1988 so that study would be really out dated, even more so when more reasent studyes are available, why should this study be used instead of those if not blatantly to push POV, and in a way that is clearly deceitful. [[User:HeikkiL|HeikkiL]] 20:31, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
::Sorry, i don't quite understand what you mean? i see you reverted the deletion, but why? As said, there was no citation to the "study" and even if there where one, it would be 18 years old, IPCC was found in 1988 so that study would be really out dated, even more so when more reasent studyes are available, why should this study be used instead of those if not blatantly to push POV, and in a way that is clearly deceitful. [[User:HeikkiL|HeikkiL]] 20:31, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
::And i see you locked the article, i don't see why, im not intrested on revert wars, so don't bother because of me, but i would like to hear some reasons for the revert. [[User:HeikkiL|HeikkiL]] 20:40, 26 June 2007 (EDT)