Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,282 bytes added ,  01:09, June 27, 2007
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:     
I'd never heard about this issue, but did a little research.  I think Mr. Norris is genuinely concerned about the loss of faith in America, but I don't think he actually believes there some sort of malignant conspiracy to promote atheism, nor would I believe he'd really forcibly deport or tattoo anyone.  That's my opinion. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 11:09, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
 
I'd never heard about this issue, but did a little research.  I think Mr. Norris is genuinely concerned about the loss of faith in America, but I don't think he actually believes there some sort of malignant conspiracy to promote atheism, nor would I believe he'd really forcibly deport or tattoo anyone.  That's my opinion. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 11:09, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: I am sorry, but I genuinely do not understand the lack of understanding of Mr. Norris' position being expressed here. In the two articles of his in question, he documents Atheists working in concert and through subterfuge to outlaw Christianity and convert our nation to Atheism. How is that not a "malignant conspiracy "? Here are the steps he lays out:
 +
 +
: Step 1 is to "[i]nitiate restrictions and legislation against theism and Christianity". This is done through lawsuits against public religious expression and silencing individual Christians under the guise of so-called "hate crime" laws.
 +
 +
: Step 2 is to "[t]arget younger generations with atheism". This involves "intentionally preying" on the "innocence and naïveté" of our children to "remove any residue of theism from their minds and hearts"..
 +
 +
: Step 3 is to "[p]ackage and promote atheism as reasonable and scientific", This involves perverting science in order to claim it disproves God.
 +
 +
: Mr. Norris is not joking about these things, and to knowingly mischaracterize him as doing so is to bear false witness against an honorable man. I ask the system operators to please reconsider the recent edit which, intentional or not, has exactly that effect. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 21:09, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
176

edits

Navigation menu