:He'll probably have Stramer, Macron, and Scholz for neighbors, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:28, March 2, 2025 (EST)
:He'll probably have Stramer, Macron, and Scholz for neighbors, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:28, March 2, 2025 (EST)
−
:Zelensky, and he is not alone in this, keeps misusing and misunderstanding the [[Reagan]] era slogan of "Peace through Strength". He repeated it again in the [[Oval Office]] on Friday. In this telling, "Peace Through Strength" is akin to "Might Makes Right". IOWs, the misuse of the phrase implies wartime spending to achieve a future ]]peace]]. That is not, at all, the meaning from the Reagan era in the 1980s.
+
:Zelensky, and he is not alone in this, keeps misusing and misunderstanding the [[Reagan]] era slogan of "Peace through Strength". He repeated it again in the [[Oval Office]] on Friday. In this telling, "Peace Through Strength" is akin to "Might Makes Right". IOWs, the misuse of the phrase implies wartime spending to achieve a future [[peace]]. That is not, at all, the meaning from the Reagan era in the 1980s.
:The objection of many [[Democrat]]s & [[liberal]]s was that Reagan's defense modernization and buildup in peacetime was unnecessary and the money could be used for social and welfare spending. "Peace Through Strength" meant "maintain peace through strength", not "achieve peace in the future by wartime military spending". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:21, March 2, 2025 (EST)
:The objection of many [[Democrat]]s & [[liberal]]s was that Reagan's defense modernization and buildup in peacetime was unnecessary and the money could be used for social and welfare spending. "Peace Through Strength" meant "maintain peace through strength", not "achieve peace in the future by wartime military spending". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:21, March 2, 2025 (EST)