Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,961 bytes removed ,  15:24, March 11, 2025
Line 107: Line 107:  
==CFR Membership==
 
==CFR Membership==
 
Tulsi Gabbard held a 5-year Term membership, with the Council on Foreign Relations,<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Council_on_Foreign_Relations</ref> which expired on July 1, 2019.  In an interview with big Tulsi advocate, Niko House, in March 2019, Tulsi answers questions regarding her membership with the CFR, that went viral on social media earlier this year, without ever touching on the traditional role of the council in selecting each elected President's Cabinet,<ref>https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25475-some-of-trump-s-picks-have-troubling-links-to-globalism-cfr</ref> including heads of National Security, CIA Director, Department of Defense heads, Justice, and Treasury Secretary, key Ambassador positions, and some Supreme Court appointments, from its own members.<ref>https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3582/CFR-Members-And-Bilderberg-Attendees-Appointed-By-Donald-Trump-Taken-from-the-CFR-membership-and-Bilderberg-participant-lists.aspx</ref> Tulsi's campaign message is based on the pretention that the U.S. president dictates to the CFR [[American foreign policy]], and that therefore Tulsi Gabbard will end [[Middle East]] and [[regime-change]] wars, based on Presidential/Constitutionally elected authority alone, without letting on that the opposite appears likely true – that the President is a figurehead, who executes the orders of the CFR and other shadow secret societies such as Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission.<ref>http://libertygalaxy.com/cfr-bilderberg-in-trump-admin/</ref>  Tulsi's main support comes from uninformed and easily deceived Progressive Democrats, whose source of info on the CFR is generally limited to what they read on Wikipedia and in mainstream media sources including the Guardian and Intercept as their primary news sources.  Their sources describe the council as a benign advisory think tank that compliments the elected President's foreign policies.<ref>https://youtu.be/2jArVljkZy4</ref>
 
Tulsi Gabbard held a 5-year Term membership, with the Council on Foreign Relations,<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Council_on_Foreign_Relations</ref> which expired on July 1, 2019.  In an interview with big Tulsi advocate, Niko House, in March 2019, Tulsi answers questions regarding her membership with the CFR, that went viral on social media earlier this year, without ever touching on the traditional role of the council in selecting each elected President's Cabinet,<ref>https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25475-some-of-trump-s-picks-have-troubling-links-to-globalism-cfr</ref> including heads of National Security, CIA Director, Department of Defense heads, Justice, and Treasury Secretary, key Ambassador positions, and some Supreme Court appointments, from its own members.<ref>https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3582/CFR-Members-And-Bilderberg-Attendees-Appointed-By-Donald-Trump-Taken-from-the-CFR-membership-and-Bilderberg-participant-lists.aspx</ref> Tulsi's campaign message is based on the pretention that the U.S. president dictates to the CFR [[American foreign policy]], and that therefore Tulsi Gabbard will end [[Middle East]] and [[regime-change]] wars, based on Presidential/Constitutionally elected authority alone, without letting on that the opposite appears likely true – that the President is a figurehead, who executes the orders of the CFR and other shadow secret societies such as Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission.<ref>http://libertygalaxy.com/cfr-bilderberg-in-trump-admin/</ref>  Tulsi's main support comes from uninformed and easily deceived Progressive Democrats, whose source of info on the CFR is generally limited to what they read on Wikipedia and in mainstream media sources including the Guardian and Intercept as their primary news sources.  Their sources describe the council as a benign advisory think tank that compliments the elected President's foreign policies.<ref>https://youtu.be/2jArVljkZy4</ref>
−
  −
==Position on Abortion==
  −
Gabbard's stances on abortion are inconsistent.
  −
  −
Although Tulsi Gabbard claims she is opposed to third-trimester [[abortion]], her actual Congressional abortion voting records tell a different story.<ref>https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/2/abortion#.Xb4LlW5Fw2x</ref>  Tulsi Gabbard claims she “personally” does not support abortion, and now late-term abortion.  However, she goes on to say a woman has the right to choose, and no government may stop them.  Then as a U.S. House Representative of Congress, she's passed many abortion laws, blocked laws designed to protect children, including pain-capable and born alive initiatives, has not overturned any of her existing laws in spite of her claimed lack of support for them, and year-after-year funded Planned Parenthood, providing facilities and doctors to mass murder babies. Tulsi Gabbard passed the laws promoting abortion, the legalized murder of unborn children, while promising to "protect all Americans from harm".  Many ISKCON/Hare Krishna leaders and members are currently promoting her to their congregation and to the public as a lifelong Vaishnava saint and avatar, despite their scriptures and teachings being decidedly pro-life and in opposition to Tulsi Gabbard's actions.<ref>https://back2godhead.com/category/society/abortion/</ref> After fooling the Hare Krishna religion and the Indian community that supports them, she's now moved on to the Catholic Church, whose congregation is being told Tulsi Gabbard supports a ban on late-term abortion as well.<ref>https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2019/09/10/tulsi-gabbard-supports-late-term-abortion-ban/</ref>  Careful tracking of Tulsi's campaign however, shows one set of messages delivered to conservative voters and different messages for her Democrat Party constituents, which is consistent with the Democrat Party platform on this issue.  In the first Democrat Party debate, Tulsi admitted that she's pro-abortion.
  −
  −
''The Majority Report'', a liberal, pro-choice and inappropriately named online talk show, called Gabbard a "coward" for not speaking out in favour of Roe v. Wade (1973) following the overturning of that outdated decision in June 2022. Tulsi Gabbard explained her decision not to comment on the ruling by saying that she wanted to be "thoughtful", acknowledging the sensitivity of the matter, before making a public comment.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S66gpgRKMg Tulsi Gabbard Is a Coward And Her Silence On Roe Proves It]</ref>
  −
  −
In 2024, Gabbard stated that she apparently supported the overturning, and accused the Democrat establishment of "fear-mongering" around Roe v. Wade in order to convince women to vote for the subsequently-withdrawn incumbent [[Joe Biden]].<ref>[https://twitter.com/DBrodyReports/status/1791163400845656274 David Brody on X: JUST IN: Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats are, "fear-mongering" on the abortion issue...]</ref>
      
==2020 presidential election==
 
==2020 presidential election==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,615

edits

Navigation menu