| Line 1,319: |
Line 1,319: |
| | :'''Update:''' ''[[Gatewaypundit]]'': [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/was-mike-waltz-source-jeffrey-goldberg-while-serving/ DEVELOPING: Was Mike Waltz a Source for Jeffrey Goldberg While Serving on House Intel Committee?] See what I mean? After Waltz denying that he doesn't know or ever met Goldberg, [[conservative]] media questions his integrity. What should [[CP]] do now after [[User:Conservative]] worked so hard for so many years to rehab ''[[The Atlantic]]'' and [[globalist]] [[warmonger]]s? Pretend this problem in the [[conservative movement]] doesn't exist? (See: [[Are ignorance and stupidity conservative values?]]) or flip-flop again ([[hypocritically]]) and take a position? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:39, March 26, 2025 (EDT) | | :'''Update:''' ''[[Gatewaypundit]]'': [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/was-mike-waltz-source-jeffrey-goldberg-while-serving/ DEVELOPING: Was Mike Waltz a Source for Jeffrey Goldberg While Serving on House Intel Committee?] See what I mean? After Waltz denying that he doesn't know or ever met Goldberg, [[conservative]] media questions his integrity. What should [[CP]] do now after [[User:Conservative]] worked so hard for so many years to rehab ''[[The Atlantic]]'' and [[globalist]] [[warmonger]]s? Pretend this problem in the [[conservative movement]] doesn't exist? (See: [[Are ignorance and stupidity conservative values?]]) or flip-flop again ([[hypocritically]]) and take a position? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:39, March 26, 2025 (EDT) |
| | ::[https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1904966746525868173 Paul Sperry has a rock solid record of reporting in the Russiagate hoax], but I don't have time to record it in [[Conservapedia]] without a security guarantee from Andy (or see some disciplinary measures) against [[User:Conservative]] who is hell-bent on disrupting and negating my editing with [[Google bomb]]s. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:12, March 26, 2025 (EDT) | | ::[https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1904966746525868173 Paul Sperry has a rock solid record of reporting in the Russiagate hoax], but I don't have time to record it in [[Conservapedia]] without a security guarantee from Andy (or see some disciplinary measures) against [[User:Conservative]] who is hell-bent on disrupting and negating my editing with [[Google bomb]]s. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:12, March 26, 2025 (EDT) |
| − | :::Sperry wrote, "a US intel official told me Waltz was a source for Goldberg while on HPSCI." Who was chair of HPSCI and would know who leaked to the ''Atlantic'' from the [[GOP]] side? [[Devan Nunes]]. Who is now a [[US intel]] official as chair of PIAB (President's Intelligence Advisory Board)? Devan Nunes. Who ultimately can advise President Trump if Waltz can be trusted? Nunes. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:09, March 27, 2025 (EDT) | + | :::Sperry wrote, "a US intel official told me Waltz was a source for Goldberg while on HPSCI." Who was chair of HPSCI and would know who leaked to the ''Atlantic'' from the [[GOP]] side? [[Devin Nunes]]. Who is now a [[US intel]] official as chair of PIAB (President's Intelligence Advisory Board)? Devin Nunes. Who ultimately can advise President Trump if Waltz can be trusted? Nunes. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:09, March 27, 2025 (EDT) |
| | *Can I add, if you mean by neocons - those more leaning toward hawkish attitude on Putin per se, there are more on the Democratic side.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:48, March 25, 2025 (EDT) | | *Can I add, if you mean by neocons - those more leaning toward hawkish attitude on Putin per se, there are more on the Democratic side.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:48, March 25, 2025 (EDT) |
| | ::[[USAID]]-funded ''[[Politico]]'' already has a word for it - "[https://www.politico.com/newsletters/west-wing-playbook-remaking-government/2025/03/25/what-signalgate-tells-us-about-doge-00248141 Signalgate]" - which means it's not going away (as mentioned above, a "manufactured" scandal). [[Wyden]] has already demanded Waltz & [[Hegseth]] resignations. | | ::[[USAID]]-funded ''[[Politico]]'' already has a word for it - "[https://www.politico.com/newsletters/west-wing-playbook-remaking-government/2025/03/25/what-signalgate-tells-us-about-doge-00248141 Signalgate]" - which means it's not going away (as mentioned above, a "manufactured" scandal). [[Wyden]] has already demanded Waltz & [[Hegseth]] resignations. |