Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,905
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 113:
Line 113: − +
→China rejects delivery of Boeing aircraft.
==[[China]] rejects delivery of [[Boeing]] aircraft.==
==[[China]] rejects delivery of [[Boeing]] aircraft.==
Not good. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/china-orders-airlines-not-take-deliveries-boeing-planes/] It means massive layoffs. Boeing is one of the few export products on the positive side of the ledger.
Not good. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/china-orders-airlines-not-take-deliveries-boeing-planes/] It means massive layoffs. Boeing is one of the few export products on the positive side of the [[trade balance]] ledger.
Alternatively, maybe the surplus airplanes can be sold to [[Iran]] at a reduced price. It was, after all, why the JPOAC [[Iran nuke deal]] was negotiated, cause [[NATO]] allies [[UK]] & [[France]] were violating Iran [[sanctions]] with a contract for [[Airbus]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:17, April 28, 2025 (EDT)
Alternatively, maybe the surplus airplanes can be sold to [[Iran]] at a reduced price. It was, after all, why the JPOAC [[Iran nuke deal]] was negotiated, cause [[NATO]] allies [[UK]] & [[France]] were violating Iran [[sanctions]] with a contract for [[Airbus]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:17, April 28, 2025 (EDT)