Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:  
Rational basis review, often rejecting Free Exercise challenges to mandatory vaccination laws:
 
Rational basis review, often rejecting Free Exercise challenges to mandatory vaccination laws:
 
*Miller v. McDonald, No. 24-681, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4839, 2025 WL 665102, at *8 (2d Cir. Mar. 3, 2025)
 
*Miller v. McDonald, No. 24-681, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4839, 2025 WL 665102, at *8 (2d Cir. Mar. 3, 2025)
−
*We The Patriots USA, Inc. v. Conn. Off. of Early Childhood Dev., 76 F.4th 130, 156 (2d Cir. 2023), cert. denied 144 S. Ct. 2682, 219 L. Ed. 2d 1298 (2024); We The Patriots USA, Inc. v. Hochul, 17 F.4th 266, 290 (2d Cir.) ("Hochul") (per curiam), opinion clarified, 17 F.4th 368 (2d Cir. 2021), cert. denied sub nom. Dr. A v. Hochul, 142 S. Ct. 2569, 213 L. Ed. 2d 1126 (2022)
+
*We The Patriots USA, Inc. v. Conn. Off. of Early Childhood Dev., 76 F.4th 130, 156 (2d Cir. 2023), cert. denied 144 S. Ct. 2682, 219 L. Ed. 2d 1298 (2024)
 +
We The Patriots USA, Inc. v. Hochul, 17 F.4th 266, 290 (2d Cir.) ("Hochul") (per curiam), opinion clarified, 17 F.4th 368 (2d Cir. 2021), cert. denied sub nom. Dr. A v. Hochul, 142 S. Ct. 2569, 213 L. Ed. 2d 1126 (2022)
 
*Doe, 19 F.4th at 1177-80; Whitlow v. California, 203 F. Supp. 3d 1079, 1086-87 (S.D. Cal. 2016) (denying motion for preliminary injunction against SB 277 and concluding no likelihood of success on the merits for a Free Exercise claim).  
 
*Doe, 19 F.4th at 1177-80; Whitlow v. California, 203 F. Supp. 3d 1079, 1086-87 (S.D. Cal. 2016) (denying motion for preliminary injunction against SB 277 and concluding no likelihood of success on the merits for a Free Exercise claim).  
   −
Courts have held that religious exemptions to vaccine mandates go beyond what the Constitution requires.:
+
Courts have held that religious exemptions to vaccine mandates go beyond what the Constitution requires:
 
*Phillips v. City of New York, 775 F.3d 538, 543 (2d Cir. 2015);  
 
*Phillips v. City of New York, 775 F.3d 538, 543 (2d Cir. 2015);  
 
*Whitlow, 203 F. Supp. 3d at 1084 ("[I]t is clear that the Constitution does not require the provision of a religious exemption to vaccination requirements, much less a [personal belief exemption].").
 
*Whitlow, 203 F. Supp. 3d at 1084 ("[I]t is clear that the Constitution does not require the provision of a religious exemption to vaccination requirements, much less a [personal belief exemption].").
    
[[category:vaccines]]
 
[[category:vaccines]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Navigation menu