| Line 192: |
Line 192: |
| | ==Sydney Sweeney & AOC== | | ==Sydney Sweeney & AOC== |
| | After seeing Sweeney's shooting video and hearing she's a registered Republican, like [[AOC]], she apparently is the result of widespread [[marketing]] search for the right person. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:39, August 4, 2025 (EDT) | | After seeing Sweeney's shooting video and hearing she's a registered Republican, like [[AOC]], she apparently is the result of widespread [[marketing]] search for the right person. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:39, August 4, 2025 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Press Bureau of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service== |
| | + | '''Question:''' Who has better credibility at this point, the [[SVR]] or [[CIA]] which staged an attack on [[American]] [[democracy]] in the [[2016 presidential election]] and afterward with the [[Trump-Russia hoax]] and blamed their [[crime]]s on the [[SVR]]? |
| | + | {{quotebox-float|Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation: [http://svr.gov.ru/smi/2025/08/britanskie-spetssluzhby-gotovyat-ekologicheskuyu-katastrofu-v-mezhdunarodnykh-vodakh.htm] |
| | + | |
| | + | Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service has been receiving reports indicating that the [[UK]] [[intelligence agencies]] are planning to involve [[NATO]] allies to launch a massive raid on the so-called [[shadow fleet]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | [[London]] intends to use a resonating incident with one or several tankers for launching this campaign. 👉 This plan provides for a major act of [[sabotage]] so that the resulting damage can be used as the pretext for Russia’s oil shipments to be dubbed a threat to international maritime navigation. This would, in turn, give [[the West]] a free hand in taking countermeasures. They can go as far as detaining any vessels deemed suspicious in international waters and escorting them to ports in NATO countries. |
| | + | |
| | + | The Britons are considering the two options as possible [[casus belli]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | • First — staging an accident with an undesirable tanker in a narrow spot along maritime navigation routes, such as in a strait. London believes that an oil spill or the fact that the accident results in blocking the waterway would give NATO countries 'sufficient grounds' for creating a precedent to carry out special and extraordinary inspections of vessels in a pretended move to check them for compliance with navigation safety rules and [[environmental]] standards. |
| | + | |
| | + | • Second — setting a tanker on fire while it unloads its cargo at a port of a country friendly to Russia. In this case, the fire is expected to cause serious damage to port infrastructure and to spread to other ships, which would require an international investigation. |
| | + | |
| | + | ❗️London intends to task [[SBU|Ukrainian security services]] with carrying out these [[terrorist]] attacks. |
| | + | |
| | + | In fact, the [[UK]] expects the perpetrators to do the dirty work and to fail at [[cover up|covering up]] their tracks, which would serve as a safety guarantee for the [[British]]. The international investigation would hold [[Russia]] responsible for the disaster, while in the worst-case scenario [[Ukraine]] will bear the blame, as it happened with the bombing of the [[Nord Stream pipelines]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | The UK plans to choose the right moment for the attack so that it creates a ripple effect in the [[media]] for pressuring [[Trump 1.0|Donald Trump administration]] to compromise its national interests and forcing [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] to go all out in imposing harsh [[economic sanctions|secondary sanctions]] on the buyers of [[Russian oil|Russian energy]] resources by casting them as having indirectly contributed to this tragedy. |
| | + | |
| | + | The [[MI6|UK’s intelligence community]] has totally lost the remnants of any good sense because of the reminiscence for the time when [[Britain]] ruled the seas, with the British crown approving [[pirate]] [[lawless]]ness at [[sea]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | It is high time that our UK colleagues understood that their increasingly brazen attempts not only to 'spite' their rivals, but to undermine global energy security and environment can make even their closest allies run out of patience.}} |