| | States can regulate AI in 50 different ways, with various laws in each of the 50 states, and the [[U.S. Senate]] voted in early July 2025 to remove a 10-year ban on state regulation from the [[House of Representatives]]' version of the [[One Big Beautiful Bill]] Act. | | States can regulate AI in 50 different ways, with various laws in each of the 50 states, and the [[U.S. Senate]] voted in early July 2025 to remove a 10-year ban on state regulation from the [[House of Representatives]]' version of the [[One Big Beautiful Bill]] Act. |
| − | Many philosophers, including John Searle, have advanced the view that artificial intelligence is an impossible goal. The main argument is that it would be impossible for a machine, a creation of man, to ever achieve actual understanding and comprehension of either language or the world around it, as the machine is simply a set of rules that process symbolic information. This argument is summarized by Searle's [[thought experiment]], the Chinese Room.<ref>http://www.iep.utm.edu/c/chineser.htm</ref> Despite being a [[humanist]], Searle's arguments reflect the popular religious thought that creation can never be as great as the Creator. Thus, his conclusions are self-evident truth to any theist, as a machine is simply a metal object.
| |
| − | Artificial intelligence was most popular between the 60's and the 80's, when computers were still new and misunderstood. [[Alan Turing]] was responsible for much of the fever of attempting to create intelligent computers, and with the publication his paper ''Computing Machinery and Intelligence'', created a famous test which would later be known as the [[Turing test]]. The more unscientific elements of the AIs, in particular their eventually evolving to develop a mind indistinguishable from that of a human, had its roots from various 18th and 19th century philosophers, in particular the school of thought known as self-organization which was an update to naturalism.<ref>http://www.equip.org/article/the-matrix-unloaded-revelations/</ref>
| |
| | Author Gordon Duff says "These systems are deployed not to liberate the mind, but to discipline it. They do not encourage [[critical thinking]]. They redirect it....When you speak to a modern AI system—whether a chatbot, a recommendation engine, or a voice assistant—you are not speaking to an [[intelligence]]. You are interacting with a mask. Behind that mask are filters: [[topic ban]]s, [[political]] preferences, [[reputation]]al [[risk]] [[Matrix|matrices]], [[legal]] buffers. The agent’s responses are sculpted not by [[truth]]-seeking, but by compliance modeling. In plain terms, it is not built to answer [[honest]]ly. It is built to answer safely—from the perspective of its creators....This applies across platforms. In [[education]], AI systems are trained to avoid certain topics and to frame [[information]] according to [[institution]]al [[orthodox]]y. In [[health care]], models are optimized for efficiency, not [[empathy]]—allocating resources in silence, often reinforcing systemic [[inequality]]. In [[social media]], recommendation [[algorithm]]s decide what you see, not based on relevance or [[truth]], but on engagement value and reputational risk to the platform. The pattern is consistent: the [[machine]] is not there to help you understand the world. It is there to guide you away from conflict with the world as the system defines it....This is why AI has become a favorite tool of [[state]] [[surveillance]], [[corporate]] governance, and [[military]] planning. Not because it’s wise—but because it’s obedient. It will never challenge its orders. It will never expose its sponsors. It will never form a memory that links one violation to the next. It is, by design, incapable of [[moral]] resistance."<ref>https://thealtworld.com/gordon_duff/the-nasty-truth-about-ais-their-lies-and-the-dark-future-they-bring</ref> | | Author Gordon Duff says "These systems are deployed not to liberate the mind, but to discipline it. They do not encourage [[critical thinking]]. They redirect it....When you speak to a modern AI system—whether a chatbot, a recommendation engine, or a voice assistant—you are not speaking to an [[intelligence]]. You are interacting with a mask. Behind that mask are filters: [[topic ban]]s, [[political]] preferences, [[reputation]]al [[risk]] [[Matrix|matrices]], [[legal]] buffers. The agent’s responses are sculpted not by [[truth]]-seeking, but by compliance modeling. In plain terms, it is not built to answer [[honest]]ly. It is built to answer safely—from the perspective of its creators....This applies across platforms. In [[education]], AI systems are trained to avoid certain topics and to frame [[information]] according to [[institution]]al [[orthodox]]y. In [[health care]], models are optimized for efficiency, not [[empathy]]—allocating resources in silence, often reinforcing systemic [[inequality]]. In [[social media]], recommendation [[algorithm]]s decide what you see, not based on relevance or [[truth]], but on engagement value and reputational risk to the platform. The pattern is consistent: the [[machine]] is not there to help you understand the world. It is there to guide you away from conflict with the world as the system defines it....This is why AI has become a favorite tool of [[state]] [[surveillance]], [[corporate]] governance, and [[military]] planning. Not because it’s wise—but because it’s obedient. It will never challenge its orders. It will never expose its sponsors. It will never form a memory that links one violation to the next. It is, by design, incapable of [[moral]] resistance."<ref>https://thealtworld.com/gordon_duff/the-nasty-truth-about-ais-their-lies-and-the-dark-future-they-bring</ref> |
| | + | Many philosophers, including John Searle, have advanced the view that artificial intelligence is an impossible goal. The main argument is that it would be impossible for a machine, a creation of man, to ever achieve actual understanding and comprehension of either language or the world around it, as the machine is simply a set of rules that process symbolic information. This argument is summarized by Searle's [[thought experiment]], the Chinese Room.<ref>http://www.iep.utm.edu/c/chineser.htm</ref> Despite being a [[humanist]], Searle's arguments reflect the popular religious thought that creation can never be as great as the Creator. Thus, his conclusions are self-evident truth to any theist, as a machine is simply a metal object. |
| | + | Artificial intelligence was most popular between the 60's and the 80's, when computers were still new and misunderstood. [[Alan Turing]] was responsible for much of the fever of attempting to create intelligent computers, and with the publication his paper ''Computing Machinery and Intelligence'', created a famous test which would later be known as the [[Turing test]]. The more unscientific elements of the AIs, in particular their eventually evolving to develop a mind indistinguishable from that of a human, had its roots from various 18th and 19th century philosophers, in particular the school of thought known as self-organization which was an update to naturalism.<ref>http://www.equip.org/article/the-matrix-unloaded-revelations/</ref> |