Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,953
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + +
Talk:Artificial intelligence (view source)
Revision as of 03:19, August 25, 2025
, 03:19, August 25, 2025→Enoch AI
If the [[CP]] database had not been so polluted with [[User:Conservative]]'s [[liberal claptrap]] in the field of [[foreign policy]], Mike Adams might have (or probably still could) populate his AI with Consertvapedia instead of [[Wikipedia]], which User: Conservative loves to use. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:36, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
If the [[CP]] database had not been so polluted with [[User:Conservative]]'s [[liberal claptrap]] in the field of [[foreign policy]], Mike Adams might have (or probably still could) populate his AI with Consertvapedia instead of [[Wikipedia]], which User: Conservative loves to use. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:36, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
==Question==
While Andy set the tone for this article with "''While AI has benefits, AI is being used for liberal indoctrination, and to promote harmful vices like gambling,''" is Andy going to allow [[User:Conservative]] to take over the subject with [[spam]] essays promoting the [[positive]] benefits of [[AI]], for example AI does use [[flush toilet]]s or [[gay bathhouse]]s? It would be helpful to know before wasting anymore years attempting to edit [[Conservapedia]] without being [[shadow banned]] internally. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:19, August 24, 2025 (EDT)