Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,803:
Line 1,803: +
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 05:44, September 14, 2025
, 05:44, September 14, 2025(edit summary removed)
::::Andy, when are you going to get wind [[User:Conservative]]'s [[spam]]/[[trolling]] techniques? No other website would [[tolerate]] it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:48, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
::::Andy, when are you going to get wind [[User:Conservative]]'s [[spam]]/[[trolling]] techniques? No other website would [[tolerate]] it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:48, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
:::::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_77b99694-8172-4c74-92bd-ef438b12b1c4 What is the probability that RobSmith at Conservapedia is angry at User: Conservative at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative because he has shown him how unreasonable and illogical he is concerning international politics? Is it more or less likely that User: Conservative is the more reasonable of the two when it comes to international politics?], Grok 9-14-2025: "On the question of reasonableness in international politics, it is more likely that User:Conservative holds the edge. His arguments often reference established realist scholars like Mearsheimer and factual trends (e.g., Russia's demographic crisis and sanction impacts), while RobSmith's rebuttals lean toward conspiratorial elements... User:Conservative has also expressed a preference for disengaging from unproductive debates, whereas RobSmith escalates with ad hominem attacks." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:44, September 14, 2025 (EDT)