Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,661
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,808:
Line 1,808: + + + + + + + + +
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 06:01, September 14, 2025
, 06:01, September 14, 2025(edit summary removed)
::::::And according to you, Mearsheimer is a blowhard. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:50, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
::::::And according to you, Mearsheimer is a blowhard. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:50, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
*[What is the probability that User:Conservative is a spammer and troll at Conservapedia?]
"Based on available information from Conservapedia's own internal discussions and external analyses (e.g., RationalWiki and community forums), User:Conservative appears to be a long-term editor whose behavior has been repeatedly accused of fitting the site's definitions of trolling and spamming. These definitions, outlined in Conservapedia's guidelines, include "spending 90% of editing time on redundant arguments, complaining, harassing, or impeding other editors' productive activity" (the 90/10 rule) and "employing redundant arguments to waste time or distract from contributions."
Specific evidence includes:
Multiple complaints on talk pages (e.g., User talk:Aschlafly) describe User:Conservative as engaging in "long-term trolling," "severely disrupting" article development (such as on the 118th United States Congress), "spamming the same personal attacks for years," and recent "troll sprees" involving praise for controversial topics like the desecularization of Syria by U.S.-backed groups, while mocking other viewpoints. These are dated as recently as October and December 2024, indicating ongoing activity.
No direct evidence confirms spamming in the sense of automated or promotional posts (e.g., unrelated links), but the "spamming" label in complaints refers to repetitive, unproductive content. Despite these accusations, the user remains active without apparent permanent blocks, suggesting either tolerance by site administrators or ineffective moderation."