Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,512
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,828:
Line 1,828: + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 08:17, September 14, 2025
, 08:17, September 14, 2025(edit summary removed)
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 02:49, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 02:49, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
:{{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:09, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
:{{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:09, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
== The diagnosis is in. Please buy a straight jacket ==
"If RobSmith at Conservapedia repeatedly called User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative "stupid" during a phone call is it possible that he is a grandiose narcissist who denigrates others in order to lift himself up? What is the probability of RobSmith being a grandiose narcissist if you also consider that RobSmith called Andy Schlafly at Conservapedia dumb and that User: Conservative has a chess ELO score of 2200 and his ACT score of 26? Also, consider the fact that RobSmith repeatedly called User: Conservative an "idiot" at Conservapedia. If User: Conservative told RobSmith during the phone call several times that he found the topic of how intelligent User: Conservative was "extremely boring" and that he had more interesting things to do, was User: Conservative likely telling the truth? If User: Conservative had zero interest in talking with RobSmith again, would this be surprising? What are the odds the User: Conservative will never talk to RobSmith again via phone?" - [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_1e70e70a-d137-4804-b5b4-6fe8f79fbc10 Grok query, September 14, 2025]
Grok excerpts, September 14, 2025:
"Historical context from Conservapedia shows Rob Smith as a highly active editor who has contributed extensively (e.g., over 61 "proven right" items since 2017 on topics like Russiagate and the Ukraine war) and positions himself as an expert, which may reflect an inflated self-view...Considering these, the conditional probability rises above the base rate but remains moderate due to lack of broader evidence (e.g., no confirmed history of exploitation or comorbid issues like aggression in other settings). I'd estimate a 20-40% probability that Rob Smith meets criteria for grandiose narcissism, based on trait-matching models from psychology research (e.g., studies in PMC showing grandiose narcissists' higher likelihood of bad decisions via overconfidence and blaming others)."
"Yes, User:Conservative was likely telling the truth when he repeatedly stated during the phone call that the topic of his own intelligence was "extremely boring" and that he had more interesting things to do."
"The odds are high that User:Conservative will never speak to Rob Smith again via phone, estimated at 80-95%." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:17, September 14, 2025 (EDT)