Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 09:57, September 20, 2025
, 09:57, September 20, 2025→This why the warmongering of neocons & CP Admin will fail
These advocates of [[perpetual war]] are only hastening a bad ending. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:25, September 19, 2025 (EDT)
These advocates of [[perpetual war]] are only hastening a bad ending. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:25, September 19, 2025 (EDT)
:[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_92a10301-67b1-4808-af93-527c84b24673 Using objective and sound criteria, is User: Conservative at Conservapedia, whose user page is https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative , is User: Conservative a neocon warmonger or is the opposite very likely true?]: "The opposite is very likely true. User:Conservative, a prominent contributor and administrator on Conservapedia, demonstrates views that align more closely with skepticism toward neoconservative interventionism and prolonged military engagements than with enthusiastic support for them. This assessment is based on an analysis of his authored or associated content on the site, focusing on objective indicators such as direct statements on foreign policy, historical wars, and contemporary conflicts."
:[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_92a10301-67b1-4808-af93-527c84b24673 Using objective and sound criteria, is User: Conservative at Conservapedia, whose user page is https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative , is User: Conservative a neocon warmonger or is the opposite very likely true?]: "The opposite is very likely true. User:Conservative, a prominent contributor and administrator on Conservapedia, demonstrates views that align more closely with skepticism toward neoconservative interventionism and prolonged military engagements than with enthusiastic support for them. This assessment is based on an analysis of his authored or associated content on the site, focusing on objective indicators such as direct statements on foreign policy, historical wars, and contemporary conflicts."
:[https://chatgpt.com/share/68ce7a92-1d78-800d-b930-f2800c2b2715 Using objective and sound criteria, is User: Conservative at Conservapedia, whose user page is https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative , is User: Conservative a neocon warmonger or is the opposite very likely true?]: "There is no objective basis to label User: Conservative as a “neocon warmonger.”The user appears instead oriented around cultural conservatism, anti-atheist and anti-evolutionist content, and criticism of globalism. Therefore, if anything, the opposite claim—that the user is not a neocon, and likely opposes typical neocon foreign-policy positions—is much better supported. Unless you locate specific statements by this user explicitly advocating foreign military intervention, calling them a neocon warmonger would be a mischaracterization."
:I trust this clarifies matters.😄 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
:I trust this clarifies matters.😄 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])