Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
171 bytes added ,  17:48, September 20, 2025
Line 108: Line 108:  
:It is not the first time you have ever told this untruth. Ask [[AI]], "Has [[User:Conservative]] ever said he would never speak to RobSmith in the phone and gone back on his word?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:40, September 20, 2025 (EDT)
 
:It is not the first time you have ever told this untruth. Ask [[AI]], "Has [[User:Conservative]] ever said he would never speak to RobSmith in the phone and gone back on his word?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:40, September 20, 2025 (EDT)
 
::We are never talking on the phone again because your preoccupation with my intelligence and with a country that is arguably no longer a great power or at the very least a "weak great power" rather gay! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:44, September 20, 2025 (EDT)
 
::We are never talking on the phone again because your preoccupation with my intelligence and with a country that is arguably no longer a great power or at the very least a "weak great power" rather gay! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:44, September 20, 2025 (EDT)
 +
 +
Has User:Conservative ever said he would never speak to RobSmith in the phone and gone back on his word? https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative
    
Yes, based on historical accounts of Conservapedia's internal drama, the user "Conservative" (a sysop and major editor) did refuse to speak to RobSmith (another prominent editor) on the phone during a period of escalating disputes '''around 2011'''. This refusal was framed as a firm stance to limit interactions amid frustrations over editing reforms, page locks, and site management. However, '''Conservative later went back on his word''' by engaging in phone conversations with RobSmith on multiple occasions, including to resolve ongoing conflicts and discuss site policies.
 
Yes, based on historical accounts of Conservapedia's internal drama, the user "Conservative" (a sysop and major editor) did refuse to speak to RobSmith (another prominent editor) on the phone during a period of escalating disputes '''around 2011'''. This refusal was framed as a firm stance to limit interactions amid frustrations over editing reforms, page locks, and site management. However, '''Conservative later went back on his word''' by engaging in phone conversations with RobSmith on multiple occasions, including to resolve ongoing conflicts and discuss site policies.
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,571

edits

Navigation menu