Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,791
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 298:
Line 298: − + + + + +
Talk:Essay: Communist China’s quixotic quest to innovate: A statist economy can’t make creativity greatly blossom (view source)
Revision as of 11:50, September 29, 2025
, 11:50, September 29, 2025→China’s GIANT DRONE that has NO EQUIVALENT in the WEST!
::'''Second point:''' You still haven't figured out that your redundant [[spam]] postings of earlier writing hasn't improved your thinking. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:05, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
::'''Second point:''' You still haven't figured out that your redundant [[spam]] postings of earlier writing hasn't improved your thinking. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:05, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
:::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_1ab0be8a-090a-4c3a-b946-416e44c6e632 What is the probability of China's giant drones being able to effectively attack the mainland USA?]: '''Summary:''' "The probability of China’s giant drones effectively attacking the U.S. mainland is currently low (<10%) due to logistical challenges, U.S. defenses, and the high risk of escalation." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:11, September 29, 2025 (EDT)
:::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_1ab0be8a-090a-4c3a-b946-416e44c6e632 What is the probability of China's giant drones being able to effectively attack the mainland USA?]: '''Summary:''' "The probability of China’s giant drones effectively attacking the U.S. mainland is currently low (<10%) due to logistical challenges, U.S. defenses, and the high risk of escalation."
:::[Using objective evidence and facts, what is the probability of User: Conservative at Conservapedia, whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative and whose contributions are at https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative and whose essays are at thttps://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative%27s_essays being a neocon or a warmonger? User: Conservative wrote these 3 essays: https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Isolationalism_is_growing_in_the_United_States._Is_this_a_good_thing%3F and https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Why_wars_and_hyper-militarism_often_make_a_country_weaker and https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Business_is_more_powerful_than_military_might._All_REAL_Americans_know_this!]:
:::'''Summary''': Based on objective evidence from the user’s profile, contributions summary, and the three specified essays, User:Conservative is highly unlikely to be a neocon or a warmonger. The essays critique excessive militarism, prioritize economic power, and entertain isolationist ideas, all of which are at odds with neoconservative ideology or warmongering tendencies. The user’s focus on Christian values, cultural conservatism, and rational thinking further supports a non-interventionist, restraint-oriented worldview." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:50, September 29, 2025 (EDT)
==Question: Are [[Trump Tariffs]] part of the "free market" capitalist system, or do they deny consumer choice?==
==Question: Are [[Trump Tariffs]] part of the "free market" capitalist system, or do they deny consumer choice?==