Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
410 bytes added ,  16:23, July 3, 2007
Is peer review any guarentee of correctness?
We need to clarify whether peer review means that an article has been certified as ''correct'' or whether it just means that it looks plausible enough to be published - and that the real checking begins when scientists attempt to ''replicate the results''.

In other words, where does scientific [[due diligence]] begin? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:23, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu