228
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + +
no edit summary
In other words, where does scientific [[due diligence]] begin? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:23, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
In other words, where does scientific [[due diligence]] begin? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:23, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
:This is a straw man. Nothing is ever "correct" in science, in the sense you mean. Everything is limited by the accuracy of our measuring devices and our ability to theorize and conceptual the subjects. Having replicable results is crucial in something becoming widely accepted. If something is not replicable, it would likely be disputed, and the original researchers will be able to improve their work.
:Ed, I also suggest you remove that quote from Climateaudit. I can't access the page now at work (it's blocked), but from what I recall, it is '''not''' an objective source. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 12:27, 3 July 2007 (EDT)