Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,581
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,862:
Line 1,862: − − === Your approach that you have used for 20 years is obviously the wrong approach. It's time to change your approach === − − RobSmith, you wrote above: "That [[User:Conservative]] is allowed to tie up these categories, [[:Category:Diplomacy]] & [[:Category:Foreign_Affairs]] and clog up the internal search engine with insane [[claptrap]] that prohibits me from continuing to work on subjects I have been working on for 20 years." − − Your approach that you have used for 20 years is obviously the wrong approach. It's time to change your approach. − − This is currently on Conservapedia main page right and it was put there by you: "Times of London: Kyiv won't last til spring. [https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/i-hate-to-say-it-but-kyiv-wont-last-till-spring-5vlv0mb8j]" − − The article is from Roger Boyles at the Times of London. − − [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_5e95991d-dbfa-4709-aa92-2ef026c2d725 How reliable are the predictions of ROGER BOYES?] − − Out of the 41 dated, check-able predictions Roger Boyes made in The Times between 2018 and today (2 Nov 2025), − − '''32 were wrong (that’s 78 %).''' − − The other 9 were broadly right. So: 32 wrong, 9 right. Simple! − − '''Key point:''' A high percentage of the main page right content by RobSmith that deals with foreign affairs is fluff or totally wrongheaded. − − '''Real forecast:''' [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_1dd0d198-1ee0-42fe-888c-3f24d8b726ed What is the probabilty that Ukraine can fight the war in Ukraine until the end of 2026 if it is necessary to do so? Give me scenarios and their probabilities.] − − '''Summary:''' Ukraine has a 65% chance of sustaining the war until the end of 2026 if it chooses to fight on. − − I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:20, November 11, 2025 (EST)
User talk:Aschlafly (view source)
Revision as of 14:58, November 11, 2025
, 14:58, November 11, 2025→Your approach that you have used for 20 years is obviously the wrong approach. It's time to change your approach
==This simply is not fair==
==This simply is not fair==
That [[User:Conservative]] is allowed to tie up these categories, [[:Category:Diplomacy]] & [[:Category:Foreign_Affairs]] and clog up the internal search engine with insane [[claptrap]] that prohibits me from continuing to work on subjects I have been working on for 20 years. He does not even have the courtesy to voluntarily remove them himself without an "order" from you, even though he has admitted for years he has no knowledge, interest, or understanding of the subjects and has only created this [[information pollution]] to interfere with and limit my work. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:55, November 11, 2025 (EST)
That [[User:Conservative]] is allowed to tie up these categories, [[:Category:Diplomacy]] & [[:Category:Foreign_Affairs]] and clog up the internal search engine with insane [[claptrap]] that prohibits me from continuing to work on subjects I have been working on for 20 years. He does not even have the courtesy to voluntarily remove them himself without an "order" from you, even though he has admitted for years he has no knowledge, interest, or understanding of the subjects and has only created this [[information pollution]] to interfere with and limit my work. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:55, November 11, 2025 (EST)