Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,332
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + + +
Talk:Conservative of the Year 2025 (view source)
Revision as of 11:20, December 26, 2025
, 11:20, December 26, 2025More of a response than such matters deserve
:::The only ones I've driven away (without blocking, mind you) are rattrolls - they don't want to mess with me. Cons & Karajou just kept baiting them, daily, in a [[stupid]] game of cat n mouse. We haven't a single vandal attack in years now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 04:10, December 26, 2025 (EST)
:::The only ones I've driven away (without blocking, mind you) are rattrolls - they don't want to mess with me. Cons & Karajou just kept baiting them, daily, in a [[stupid]] game of cat n mouse. We haven't a single vandal attack in years now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 04:10, December 26, 2025 (EST)
::::We have'nt had a vandal attack, because Andy blocked all user registration. Now they can't attack the site, but we die from attrition, instead. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 06:20, December 26, 2025 (EST)
==A policy question==
==A policy question==
DavidB4: Let me ask you a [[policy]] question: Should it be considered acceptable conduct to harass, [[troll]], and [[slander]] an editor, six months later and ongoing for years, because they made a nomination on this page? Answer the '''[[policy]]''' question without making a personal remark or questioning the motives of another editor. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 04:31, December 26, 2025 (EST)
DavidB4: Let me ask you a [[policy]] question: Should it be considered acceptable conduct to harass, [[troll]], and [[slander]] an editor, six months later and ongoing for years, because they made a nomination on this page? Answer the '''[[policy]]''' question without making a personal remark or questioning the motives of another editor. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 04:31, December 26, 2025 (EST)
:The facts in this particular case are quite different (and more complex) than what you have said, but I will play your game only for a moment. If your version of this story was complete and correct, then no, that would not be appropriate. I've seen both of you violating established policy. In a mud slinging contest, no one comes out clean. But you started this, not him. He was respectful to you, until you were disrespectful to him. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 06:20, December 26, 2025 (EST)
==Conservapedia is not a [[cult of personality]], and [[Conservapedia]] should stop treating it as such==
==Conservapedia is not a [[cult of personality]], and [[Conservapedia]] should stop treating it as such==