Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 383: Line 383:  
*Comment: so-called experts seem at a loss to explain Trump's interest or obsession with Greenland. My take: It is one way to facilitate the destruction of [[NATO]] (in addition to NATO's defeat in the [[Ukraine war]]), which actively [[conspire]]d against him (that is, [[MI6]] & [[GCHQ]]) in the [[Russia hoax]] as early as 2015. NATO serves no good purpose, especially since it has interfered in [[American]] [[democracy]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]</sup> 21:46, January 17, 2026 (EST)
 
*Comment: so-called experts seem at a loss to explain Trump's interest or obsession with Greenland. My take: It is one way to facilitate the destruction of [[NATO]] (in addition to NATO's defeat in the [[Ukraine war]]), which actively [[conspire]]d against him (that is, [[MI6]] & [[GCHQ]]) in the [[Russia hoax]] as early as 2015. NATO serves no good purpose, especially since it has interfered in [[American]] [[democracy]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]</sup> 21:46, January 17, 2026 (EST)
 
*NATO force (all 37 of them) pledged to defend Greenland against [[US]] aggression to the last Greenlander. [https://x.com/Osint613/status/2011874091624776054]
 
*NATO force (all 37 of them) pledged to defend Greenland against [[US]] aggression to the last Greenlander. [https://x.com/Osint613/status/2011874091624776054]
 +
 +
*[[Andrew Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/trumps-latest-tariffs-against-several Trump’s Latest Tariffs Against Several NATO Allies Could Have Far-Reaching Consequences].
 +
 
*Hans Monke: "The notion that America wants Greenland for its raw materials is either insanely [[ignorant]] or just engagement bait [Ed.: to say nothing of all the [[coprophage]]s who fell for the [[Russophobic]] [[psyop]].]. Extracting anything in the Arctic is prohibitively expensive, and often physically impossible, with extreme cold, thick ice, equipment that won’t function, and no roads, rail or ports to move anything once you have it.
 
*Hans Monke: "The notion that America wants Greenland for its raw materials is either insanely [[ignorant]] or just engagement bait [Ed.: to say nothing of all the [[coprophage]]s who fell for the [[Russophobic]] [[psyop]].]. Extracting anything in the Arctic is prohibitively expensive, and often physically impossible, with extreme cold, thick ice, equipment that won’t function, and no roads, rail or ports to move anything once you have it.
 
:"The real reason America needs Greenland is its immense geostrategic military value, which should be obvious to anyone with a functioning brain, especially anyone who has ever looked at a map from above, with the North Pole at the center.  
 
:"The real reason America needs Greenland is its immense geostrategic military value, which should be obvious to anyone with a functioning brain, especially anyone who has ever looked at a map from above, with the North Pole at the center.  
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,243

edits

Navigation menu