Changes

*NATO force (all 37 of them) pledged to defend Greenland against [[US]] aggression to the last Greenlander. [https://x.com/Osint613/status/2011874091624776054]

*NATO force (all 37 of them) pledged to defend Greenland against [[US]] aggression to the last Greenlander. [https://x.com/Osint613/status/2011874091624776054]

*Hans Monke: "The notion that America wants Greenland for its raw materials is either insanely [[ignorant]] or just engagement bait [Ed.: to say nothing of all the [[coprophage]]s who fell for the [[Russophobic]] [[psyop]].]. Extracting anything in the Arctic is prohibitively expensive, and often physically impossible, with extreme cold, thick ice, equipment that won’t function, and no roads, rail or ports to move anything once you have it.

*Hans Monke: "The notion that America wants Greenland for its raw materials is either insanely [[ignorant]] or just engagement bait [Ed.: to say nothing of all the [[coprophage]]s who fell for the [[Russophobic]] [[psyop]].] Extracting anything in the Arctic is prohibitively expensive, and often physically impossible, with extreme cold, thick ice, equipment that won’t function, and no roads, rail or ports to move anything once you have it.

:"The real reason America needs Greenland is its immense geostrategic military value, which should be obvious to anyone with a functioning brain, especially anyone who has ever looked at a map from above, with the North Pole at the center.  

:"The real reason America needs Greenland is its immense geostrategic military value, which should be obvious to anyone with a functioning brain, especially anyone who has ever looked at a map from above, with the North Pole at the center.  

:"Sure, '''some tasks could be outsourced to [[NATO]], but that alliance is on its last legs, burdened by too many countries with conflicting priorities, and has mainly served as a way for [[Europe]] to freeload on [[US]] [[security guarantee]]s.''' Relying on it for American national security is reckless. It’s far smarter to cut out the endless middlemen and take direct control."[https://x.com/HansMahncke/status/2008740268216913979]

:"Sure, '''some tasks could be outsourced to [[NATO]], but that alliance is on its last legs, burdened by too many countries with conflicting priorities, and has mainly served as a way for [[Europe]] to freeload on [[US]] [[security guarantee]]s.''' Relying on it for American national security is reckless. It’s far smarter to cut out the endless middlemen and take direct control."[https://x.com/HansMahncke/status/2008740268216913979]