| Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| | All along, Shakir was and is dismissing Israel's security concerns but instead maliciously defaming it. | | All along, Shakir was and is dismissing Israel's security concerns but instead maliciously defaming it. |
| | | | |
| | + | |
| | + | In Feb 2026, racist<ref>[https://www.danielpipes.org/comments/277273 Racism under 'palestinianism' is an "accepted" garbage]. |
| | + | By Omar (United States), at DP, Dec 14, 2021. |
| | + | {{Cquote|The new and "improved" anti-Jewish intolerance also known as anti-Semitism found a great guise. It's called "Palestinianism." |
| | + | |
| | + | Though the lie of "pro-Palestinian" is less old than the 1960s invented "Palestinian" nation, in and of itself, for the mostly children or grandchildren of Arab immigrants as a supposed separate Arab group. |
| | + | |
| | + | There is mostly anti-Israelism. Few really care about this group of people but have conveniently using them as a cannon fodder for their anti-Jewish agenda. Including those that hate Arabs too. |
| | + | |
| | + | Often today's anti-Jewish campaign includes the Z word as if it's not about anti-all-Jewish but, merely protesting the policies. There is even a fancier word for this racism, its called "criticism." As if, for example, giving away land such Gaza in 2005 changed any of the hate machine. On the contrary. Genocidal Hamas rose and racist Omar Shakir & Co. Is even more emboldened with the A slur. Or anti-Jewish Haaretzism machine as a whole.}}</ref> Omar Shakir resigned from anti-Israel HRW for not being extremist enough. |
| | ==Hype terminology== | | ==Hype terminology== |
| | | | |
| Line 357: |
Line 367: |
| | ===BDS=== | | ===BDS=== |
| | As Ben & Jerry's board who since 2018 allied with bigot [[Linda Sarsour]] announced in July-2021, it will no longer sell in the "territories" (after previously thinking of banning all of Israel), it was revealed that its board, chaired by [[Hamas]], [[Hezbollah]] supporter Anuradha Mittal,<ref>[https://freebeacon.com/national-security/meet-ben-jerrys-board-chair-anti-israel-activist-has-published-defenses-of-hezbollah-hamas/ Meet Ben & Jerry’s Board Chair: Anti-Israel Activist Has Published Defenses of Hezbollah, Hamas]. | | As Ben & Jerry's board who since 2018 allied with bigot [[Linda Sarsour]] announced in July-2021, it will no longer sell in the "territories" (after previously thinking of banning all of Israel), it was revealed that its board, chaired by [[Hamas]], [[Hezbollah]] supporter Anuradha Mittal,<ref>[https://freebeacon.com/national-security/meet-ben-jerrys-board-chair-anti-israel-activist-has-published-defenses-of-hezbollah-hamas/ Meet Ben & Jerry’s Board Chair: Anti-Israel Activist Has Published Defenses of Hezbollah, Hamas]. |
| − | Anuradha Mittal founded nonprofit that accused Israel of human rights abuses and defended Hezbollah. | + | Anuradha Mittal founded nonprofit that accused Israel of human rights abuses[sic] and defended Hezbollah. |
| − | Alana Goodman, Free Beacon, July 23, 2021 <blockquote> | + | Alana Goodman, ''Free Beacon'', July 23, 2021 <blockquote> |
| | Ben & Jerry's board chairwoman isn't your average corporate suit. A social justice warrior who's now under increased scrutiny in the wake of the company's announcement that it will boycott Israel's West Bank and East Jerusalem, she has a lengthy history of left-wing activism that includes publishing columns defending Hezbollah and supporting U.S. funding to Hamas. | | Ben & Jerry's board chairwoman isn't your average corporate suit. A social justice warrior who's now under increased scrutiny in the wake of the company's announcement that it will boycott Israel's West Bank and East Jerusalem, she has a lengthy history of left-wing activism that includes publishing columns defending Hezbollah and supporting U.S. funding to Hamas. |
| | | | |
| Line 373: |
Line 383: |
| | <blockquote>Not surprising since Omar S Shakir was kicked out of Israel for being a BDS activist. | | <blockquote>Not surprising since Omar S Shakir was kicked out of Israel for being a BDS activist. |
| | | | |
| − | First he pressured FIFA, then airbnb, and now Benandjerrys. | + | First he pressured [[FIFA]], then airbnb, and now Benandjerrys. |
| | | | |
| | His entire "human rights" career has been devoted to pressuring companies to boycott Israel.</blockquote> | | His entire "human rights" career has been devoted to pressuring companies to boycott Israel.</blockquote> |
| Line 395: |
Line 405: |
| | </blockquote> | | </blockquote> |
| | ([https://twitter.com/OGAride/status/1653573359106678785 May 2, 2023]).</ref> <blockquote> Omar Shakir, hailing Iranian backed Islamic Jihad leader Khader Adnan (a terrorist who espouses horrific fundamentalist rhetoric) a hero. This says far more about Omar and Human Rights Watch than anything.</blockquote> | | ([https://twitter.com/OGAride/status/1653573359106678785 May 2, 2023]).</ref> <blockquote> Omar Shakir, hailing Iranian backed Islamic Jihad leader Khader Adnan (a terrorist who espouses horrific fundamentalist rhetoric) a hero. This says far more about Omar and Human Rights Watch than anything.</blockquote> |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Shameful responses to the genocidal-"Palestinian" Gaza regime Hamas Oct 7 atrocities== |
| | + | Shameful responses to the genocidal-[[Palestinian]] [[Gaza]] regime Hamas [[Oct 7 War|Oct 7]] atrocities: |
| | + | |
| | + | {{Cquote|Human Rights Watch, ostensibly one of the world’s most respected moral organizations, waited more than two days to issue a statement. When it did, the text was not a clear and direct condemnation of this monstrous war crime. Instead, Omar Shakir (HRW’s Israel and Palestine director) framed the unfathomably evil terror attack as a justified reaction to Israeli policies, which, in HRW’s list of slogans, include war crimes[sic], unprecedented repression[sic], unlawful closure of Gaza, inhumane[sic] acts, “domination[sic] by Jewish Israelis over Palestinians” and “crimes against humanity of apartheid[sic] and persecution[sic].” |
| | + | |
| | + | After Israel’s military entered Gaza to destroy the massive terror infrastructure there, Shakir and Program Director Sari Bashi repeated the slogans and added other accusations, such as “deliberate, indiscriminate[sic], or disproportionate attacks” in numerous media appearances and social media posts. The Israeli victims were mostly erased. |
| | + | <ref>Gerald M. Sreinberg. [https://www.jns.org/behind-the-human-rights-watch-curtain-hate-and-corruption/ Behind the Human Rights Watch curtain: Hate and corruption]. ''JNS''. Dec 4, 2023. |
| | + | Dedicated to the memory of HRW founder Robert Bernstein.</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| | ==Resignation== | | ==Resignation== |
| Line 418: |
Line 437: |
| | **Second**, it covers the resignation of (radical [[Arab]] Islamist bigot) [[Omar Shakir]], Human Rights Watch’s Israel/Palestine director. Shakir accused [[HRW]] leadership of blocking a report labeling Israel’s refusal to accept a broad Palestinian “right of return” as a crime against humanity. HRW said the report did not meet its standards, and even former executive director Ken Roth criticized its legal basis. The editorial argues that HRW has long politicized human rights issues regarding Israel and suggests Shakir’s resignation reflects internal tensions created by that approach. | | **Second**, it covers the resignation of (radical [[Arab]] Islamist bigot) [[Omar Shakir]], Human Rights Watch’s Israel/Palestine director. Shakir accused [[HRW]] leadership of blocking a report labeling Israel’s refusal to accept a broad Palestinian “right of return” as a crime against humanity. HRW said the report did not meet its standards, and even former executive director Ken Roth criticized its legal basis. The editorial argues that HRW has long politicized human rights issues regarding Israel and suggests Shakir’s resignation reflects internal tensions created by that approach. |
| | | | |
| − | Overall, the piece slans both NGOs, portraying them as politically driven and highlighting what it sees as the risks of advocacy organizations aligning too closely with ideological agendas. | + | Overall, the piece slamllls both NGOs, portraying them as politically driven and highlighting what it sees as the risks of advocacy organizations aligning too closely with ideological agendas. |
| | | | |
| | ==See also== | | ==See also== |