Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + + + + + + + + +
User:Conservative/Learning and thinking material (view source)
Revision as of 19:20, March 19, 2026
, March 19→Intelligence does not equal epistemic rigor
*[https://www.beautifulminds-newsletter.com/ Beautiful Minds Newsletter], Substack by a cognitive scientist on human potential
*[https://www.beautifulminds-newsletter.com/ Beautiful Minds Newsletter], Substack by a cognitive scientist on human potential
== Using AIs for learning ==
*[https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2026/01/ai-routing-framework-for-various-uses.html AI Routing Framework for various uses]
I use AIs for learning. They give me: curriculums, rapid response to my questions, and they can design tests so I practice forced recall (important for accelerated learning) plus gauge how well I have learned material. I also use AIs with search capabilities (Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot and Grok) so I am up on the latest changes to fields.
And due to Claude AI's company wanting more market share and wanting more contracts under the GOP administrations, it has become far less woke than most academics/teachers. Grok is less woke/liberal than teachers too. And if I want to get a broad view of the world, I have AIs from the USA (ChatGPT, Microsoft AI, Grok, Gemini, Perplexity, Meta, Amazon Nova, and Pi Ai), China (Deepseek and Qwen 3), France (Mistral) and Russia (Yandex Alice AI).
I also have an AI framework for the use of various AIs where there strengths exist: Information gathering (Perplexity), multistep reasoning (Copilot, Deepseek, and Qwen), structural thinking (Copilot), Synthesis (ChatGPT, CoPilot and Claude), adversarial reasoning (Grok, Deepseek and Copilot), Long arc thinking (CoPilot and Gemini) and Verification (Perplexity, Deepseek and Copilot). See: [https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2026/01/ai-routing-framework-for-various-uses.html AI Routing Framework for various uses]
== Intelligence does not equal epistemic rigor ==
== Intelligence does not equal epistemic rigor ==