Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:  
And due to Claude AI's company wanting more market share and wanting more contracts under the GOP administrations, it has become far less woke than most academics/teachers. Grok is less woke/liberal than teachers too.  And if I want to get a broad view of the world, I have AIs from the USA (ChatGPT, Microsoft AI, Grok, Gemini, Perplexity, Meta, Amazon Nova, and Pi Ai), China (Deepseek and Qwen 3), France (Mistral) and Russia (Yandex Alice AI).  
 
And due to Claude AI's company wanting more market share and wanting more contracts under the GOP administrations, it has become far less woke than most academics/teachers. Grok is less woke/liberal than teachers too.  And if I want to get a broad view of the world, I have AIs from the USA (ChatGPT, Microsoft AI, Grok, Gemini, Perplexity, Meta, Amazon Nova, and Pi Ai), China (Deepseek and Qwen 3), France (Mistral) and Russia (Yandex Alice AI).  
   −
I also have an AI framework for the use of various AIs where there strengths exist:  Information gathering (Perplexity), multistep reasoning (Copilot, Deepseek, and Qwen), structural thinking (Copilot), Synthesis (ChatGPT, CoPilot and Claude), adversarial reasoning (Grok, Deepseek and Copilot), Long arc thinking (CoPilot and Gemini) and Verification (Perplexity, Deepseek and Copilot). See: [https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2026/01/ai-routing-framework-for-various-uses.html AI Routing Framework for various uses]  
+
I also have an AI framework for the use of various AIs where there strengths exist:  Information gathering (Perplexity), multistep reasoning (Copilot, Deepseek, and Qwen), structural thinking (Copilot), Synthesis (ChatGPT, CoPilot and Claude), adversarial reasoning (Grok, Deepseek and Copilot), Long arc thinking (CoPilot and Gemini) and Verification (Perplexity, Deepseek and Copilot). See: [https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2026/01/ai-routing-framework-for-various-uses.html AI Routing Framework for various uses]
 +
 
 +
=== AI prompt to find science supporting a position ===
 +
 
 +
Read this blog post blogposts.com/X and create a new article that summarizes scientific studies supporting the psychological principles in it: https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2026/02/identity-and-passion-why-who-you-are.html Your task:
 +
 
 +
Identify the key psychological claims in this post
 +
Find peer‑reviewed studies, meta‑analyses, or reputable research that support each claim
 +
Summarize the findings in clear, simple language
 +
Include links or citations to the studies
 +
Organize the article so each section pairs a claim with the research that supports it
 +
Keep the tone neutral, factual, and evidence‑based
 +
Do NOT rewrite the original post — just show the science behind it.
    
== Intelligence does not equal epistemic rigor ==
 
== Intelligence does not equal epistemic rigor ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427

edits

Navigation menu