| | *[[Andrew Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/a-top-russian-expert-shared-a-very A Top Russian Expert Shared A Very Skeptical Assessment Of Trump 2.0]. | | *[[Andrew Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/a-top-russian-expert-shared-a-very A Top Russian Expert Shared A Very Skeptical Assessment Of Trump 2.0]. |
| − | :"“the American political [[establishment]] – [[Congress]]], the [[media]], and much of the [[The Blob|foreign policy bureaucracy]] – was deeply uncomfortable with a [[peace]] formula that could hardly be presented domestically as a victory over Russia”, ergo why the “spirit of Anchorage” fizzled out. Trump “appears to have aligned himself more closely with powerful [[political]] and [[financial]] groups in [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], including [[neoconservative]] circles and the [[Israel]]i [[lobby]]”, thus “sidelining” his “original [[MAGA]] allies”. The end result is that “Instead of presiding over the slow decline of the [[liberal]]-[[globalist]] order, Trump is attempting to build a new version of [[American]] [[hegemony]], one based far more openly on force.” Correspondingly, Trenin believes that “Washington’s objective today is not necessarily to construct a stable [[new world order]]. Rather, it may be to generate global instability and then dominate within that [[chaos]].” | + | :"“the American political [[establishment]] – [[Congress]]]\, the [[media]], and much of the [[The Blob|foreign policy bureaucracy]] – was deeply uncomfortable with a [[peace]] formula that could hardly be presented domestically as a victory over Russia”, ergo why the “spirit of Anchorage” fizzled out. Trump “appears to have aligned himself more closely with powerful [[political]] and [[financial]] groups in [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], including [[neoconservative]] circles and the [[Israel]]i [[lobby]]”, thus '''“sidelining” his “original [[MAGA]] allies”'''. The end result is that “Instead of presiding over the slow decline of the [[liberal]]-[[globalist]] order, Trump is attempting to build a new version of [[American]] [[hegemony]], one based far more openly on force.” Correspondingly, Trenin believes that “Washington’s objective today is not necessarily to construct a stable [[new world order]]. Rather, it may be to generate global instability and then dominate within that [[chaos]].” |