Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 240: Line 240:  
:"On that topic, the [[AfD]] supports a truly [[sovereign]] [[Europe]] while [[PiS ]](Poland’s [[conservative]] “Law & Justice” party with which [[Nawrocki]] is allied) supports a Europe in de facto junior partnership with the [[US]], which is why the first called for the full withdrawal of US troops while the second wants more US troops. Closer [[US]]-[[German]] [[military]] ties of the sort that Colby recently praised would thus lead to [[Trump 2.0]] opposing the AfD while weaker ties of the sort that Trump threatened could increase sympathy for it.
 
:"On that topic, the [[AfD]] supports a truly [[sovereign]] [[Europe]] while [[PiS ]](Poland’s [[conservative]] “Law & Justice” party with which [[Nawrocki]] is allied) supports a Europe in de facto junior partnership with the [[US]], which is why the first called for the full withdrawal of US troops while the second wants more US troops. Closer [[US]]-[[German]] [[military]] ties of the sort that Colby recently praised would thus lead to [[Trump 2.0]] opposing the AfD while weaker ties of the sort that Trump threatened could increase sympathy for it.
   −
:"The first expectation is self-explanatory while the second is premised on the [[National Security Strategy]]’s support for like-minded [[conservative]]-[[nationalist]]s that want to avert Europe’s “[[civilization]]al erasure”. '''[[Trump 2.0]] must thus decide whether it prefers to implement “[[NATO 3.0]]” through [[Europe]]’s ruling [[liberal]]-[[globalist]]s or accept compromises on this [[policy]] in favor of saving Europe from itself by supporting [[conservative]]-[[nationalist]]s who might oppose continued [[US]] [[hegemony]] over [[Europe]] like the [[AfD]] does.
+
:"The first expectation is self-explanatory while the second is premised on the [[2025 National Security Strategy|National Security Strategy]]’s support for like-minded [[conservative]]-[[nationalist]]s that want to avert Europe’s “[[civilization]]al erasure”. '''[[Trump 2.0]] must thus decide whether it prefers to implement “[[NATO 3.0]]” through [[Europe]]’s ruling [[liberal]]-[[globalist]]s or accept compromises on this [[policy]] in favor of saving Europe from itself by supporting [[conservative]]-[[nationalist]]s who might oppose continued [[US]] [[hegemony]] over [[Europe]] like the [[AfD]] does.
    
:"Where [[Germany]] goes, so too goes most of [[Europe]], so the choice that the US makes will either help or harm the [[AfD]]. The ideal balance of interests for [[Trump 2.0]] would be to replace [[Germany]] with [[Poland]] as its top [[EU]] ally for fortifying [[NATO]]’s Eastern Flank and not oppose the [[AfD]] in the hopes that it’ll come to power and then lead Europe’s rejuvenation."
 
:"Where [[Germany]] goes, so too goes most of [[Europe]], so the choice that the US makes will either help or harm the [[AfD]]. The ideal balance of interests for [[Trump 2.0]] would be to replace [[Germany]] with [[Poland]] as its top [[EU]] ally for fortifying [[NATO]]’s Eastern Flank and not oppose the [[AfD]] in the hopes that it’ll come to power and then lead Europe’s rejuvenation."
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,470

edits

Navigation menu