| Line 281: |
Line 281: |
| | | | |
| | :What happened to [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/288#Dems._Anti-Trump_leads_to_anti-Bibi_-_.28Face_the_Nation_4.19.26.29 "to be anti-Trump is to be anti-Bibi?"] It makes as much sense as Bibi saying "[[Hamas]] is [[ISIS]]". Trump now sounds like [[John Bolton]], [[Jake Sullivan]], and [[Hillary Clinton]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]</sup> 15:44, June 17, 2026 (EDT) | | :What happened to [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/288#Dems._Anti-Trump_leads_to_anti-Bibi_-_.28Face_the_Nation_4.19.26.29 "to be anti-Trump is to be anti-Bibi?"] It makes as much sense as Bibi saying "[[Hamas]] is [[ISIS]]". Trump now sounds like [[John Bolton]], [[Jake Sullivan]], and [[Hillary Clinton]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]</sup> 15:44, June 17, 2026 (EDT) |
| | + | :: Not really. Are ypu telling me that Trump can't change his mind from one day to the other? Are you asking: Did Israel lose alot by Bibi putting it all in Trump basket? |
| | + | |
| | + | Not sure how a (temporary or not) disagreement between the two suddenly changes all this. |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Hamas]] is still like ISIS which is why they carried [[ISIS]] flag on Oct 7 and copied ISIS methods of filming own atrocities. |
| | + | And I don't get your word salad what you oput these all in a blender... |
| | + | |
| | + | __ |
| | + | |
| | + | And it's good that '''Israel didn't sign anything on the MoU'''. |
| | + | |
| | + | Next let's see about the nukes. ... |
| | + | |
| | + | <hr> |
| | + | Takeaways from Trump news conference on Iran deal |
| | + | |
| | + | Author : CBS News · June 17, 2026. |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | Sure. Well,''' the president has been making some pretty grandiose claims all week here in Evian about the things that this one and a halfpage agreement will accomplish. Most notably, he says it will prevent Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon. But he hasn't explained how exactly the deal will do that. And the drafts that have been circulating, you know only mention Iran's nuclear program a couple of times. |
| | + | The rest of the document deals with the Straight of Hormuz, deals with sanctions, unfreezing assets and things like that. |
| | + | |
| | + | And so I just wanted to ask him directly, why are you claiming that this particular deal is going to prevent Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon? |
| | + | |
| | + | And he said, well, if they try to get a nuclear weapon, then we'll just bomb them, which may be the case, but that's not the same as a deal that enforces it. |
| | + | So, I followed up by asking him, if there's anything enforcable in this deal, any kind of mechanism that prevents Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. |
| | + | And he kind of blew it off. |
| | + | He said, "Well, what do you want me to do? |
| | + | Sue them or take them to court? What kind of enforcement are you talking about?"''' |
| | + | |
| | + | But the reality is, that the two sides are about to embark on a lengthy negotiation that will involve enforcable benchmarks. That would be enforced by the US, enforced by international agencies to hopefully ensure that Iran doesn't begin nuclear development again. And whether that negotiation will be successful is still up in the air, but it's pretty clear that this memorandum of understanding does not do what President Trump claims it does, preventing Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon. |
| | + | [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jg11AL-hTl4][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:22, June 17, 2026 (EDT) |