Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 71:
Line 71: + + Line 88:
Line 90: + + + +
→Take a look at the false premises User:Conservative inputs in AI
:'''Question:''' if China's efforts to [[innovate]] are "Quixotic", why then did the [[US Navy]] ban usage of Deepseek?
:'''Question:''' if China's efforts to [[innovate]] are "Quixotic", why then did the [[US Navy]] ban usage of Deepseek?
::My educated guess is that the USA Navy banned usage of Deepseek for the same reason that the USA banned Huawei. Programmers can build sneaky ways to monitor activity and you don't want spying on your military that is preventable. Chinese companies have to accede to the demands of the Chinese state.
::You wrote: "Most people agree a cheaper product has advantages." This is untrue and violates Management 101, Marketing 101 and Sales 101. "No, competing on price is rarely the best long-term course of action for a company. While it can drive short-term volume, it often triggers a "race to the bottom" that erodes profit margins and damages brand value."[https://www.google.com/search?q=is+competing+on+price+usually+the+best+course+of+action+for+a+company%3F&oq=is+competing+on+price+usually+the+best+course+of+action+for+a+company%3F&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8] Sales managers typically say build value in a prospect's mind and don't compete on price. Compete on value instead. However, this is true: Most companies agree that a cheaper product has advantages '''in some cases'''.
::You wrote: "Most people agree a cheaper product has advantages." This is untrue and violates Management 101, Marketing 101 and Sales 101. "No, competing on price is rarely the best long-term course of action for a company. While it can drive short-term volume, it often triggers a "race to the bottom" that erodes profit margins and damages brand value."[https://www.google.com/search?q=is+competing+on+price+usually+the+best+course+of+action+for+a+company%3F&oq=is+competing+on+price+usually+the+best+course+of+action+for+a+company%3F&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8] Sales managers typically say build value in a prospect's mind and don't compete on price. Compete on value instead. However, this is true: Most companies agree that a cheaper product has advantages '''in some cases'''.
:::'''Addendum:''' This is typical of [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]] technique: He [[spam]]s the page with so much irrelevant [[claptrap]] he hopes no one will read through it. The man is incapable of a polite, civil exchange of ideas. [[User:RobSmith|Foghorn Leghorn]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]]</sup> 20:16, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
:::'''Addendum:''' This is typical of [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]] technique: He [[spam]]s the page with so much irrelevant [[claptrap]] he hopes no one will read through it. The man is incapable of a polite, civil exchange of ideas. [[User:RobSmith|Foghorn Leghorn]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]]</sup> 20:16, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
:::::'''China's AI Qwen 3.7 judges this debate:''' "User: Conservative is winning because they successfully trapped RobSmith in a factual contradiction (forcing a concession), neutralized RobSmith's counter-arguments with established business principles, and provided a comprehensive, cited, and structured macroeconomic case. RobSmith is currently on the defensive, relying on semantic hair-splitting and personal attacks rather than advancing a cohesive counter-argument."[https://chat.qwen.ai/s/fd52a214-f723-4d32-a9cc-bee17cddf579?fev=0.3.20]
:::::As much as I hate to do it: I declare total victory in this debate. Olé! Olé! Olé! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:17, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
==Blanked pages and Karajou's bird content==
==Blanked pages and Karajou's bird content==