| Line 1,375: |
Line 1,375: |
| | :ehh, leave it to the [[Democrat]] to reinvigorate the issue. It's our only hope for 2028. [[User:RobSmith|Foghorn Leghorn]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]]</sup> 22:22, November 5, 2026 (EST) | | :ehh, leave it to the [[Democrat]] to reinvigorate the issue. It's our only hope for 2028. [[User:RobSmith|Foghorn Leghorn]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]]</sup> 22:22, November 5, 2026 (EST) |
| | We thought freedom of speech was sacrosanct and must be endured even if it put American troops in harm's way through an untimely disclosure. Now we're seeing that was just a ruse cooked up for the occasion to harm America, and now that the Democrats have seized the media over the same-sex marriage issue, the cherishing of freedom of speech and respect for the individual dissenter is a thing of the past, and conformity overrules critical discourse. Time may be of the essence. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 00:11, November 6, 2026 (EST) | | We thought freedom of speech was sacrosanct and must be endured even if it put American troops in harm's way through an untimely disclosure. Now we're seeing that was just a ruse cooked up for the occasion to harm America, and now that the Democrats have seized the media over the same-sex marriage issue, the cherishing of freedom of speech and respect for the individual dissenter is a thing of the past, and conformity overrules critical discourse. Time may be of the essence. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 00:11, November 6, 2026 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | And the icing on the cake is that the conformity of which I spoke that overrules critical discourse is a conformity to what is unnatural that forces dependency on, as it scapegoats and maligns, a conformity that is natural and suitable to mankind. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 09:52, November 7, 2026 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | ===[[User:Conservative]] now [[spamming]] [[Chuck Schumer]] talking points=== | | ===[[User:Conservative]] now [[spamming]] [[Chuck Schumer]] talking points=== |
| | + | |
| | [https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/6155906-schumer-slams-trump-putin/] | | [https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/6155906-schumer-slams-trump-putin/] |
| | [[Democrat]]s have fervently opposed [[Trump]] administration plans to reduce the U.S. military footprint in Europe, and have '''expressed <u>outrage</u> over the [[White House]]’s lack of support for [[Kyiv]] '''and recent '''efforts to reduce economic penalties for [[Moscow]]''' amid the [[Russia-Ukraine war]]. Much like Iran and the boat strikes, congressional Democrats are likely to use funding as a bargaining chip to challenge Trump on both issues. '''Democrats also signaled that regaining a majority''' would help '''speed up''' the passage of '''new [[Ukraine aid|aid packages for Ukraine]]''' | | [[Democrat]]s have fervently opposed [[Trump]] administration plans to reduce the U.S. military footprint in Europe, and have '''expressed <u>outrage</u> over the [[White House]]’s lack of support for [[Kyiv]] '''and recent '''efforts to reduce economic penalties for [[Moscow]]''' amid the [[Russia-Ukraine war]]. Much like Iran and the boat strikes, congressional Democrats are likely to use funding as a bargaining chip to challenge Trump on both issues. '''Democrats also signaled that regaining a majority''' would help '''speed up''' the passage of '''new [[Ukraine aid|aid packages for Ukraine]]''' |