1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + + +
According to AiG...
:Read my response here [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Conservative#My_.22warning.22] [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:33, 9 March 2007 (EST)
:Read my response here [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Conservative#My_.22warning.22] [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:33, 9 March 2007 (EST)
== According to AiG... ==
...the article I reverted was incorrect or at least outdated. Read [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/405.asp "How can we see distant stars in a young universe?"] and [http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v17/i2/cosmology.asp "A new cosmology: solution to the starlight travel time problem"] for the problems other creationists point out. The former article is described by AiG as the [http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/fine_structure.asp "currently favored creationist answer to the distant starlight problem"] and contains sentences like "If c has declined the way Setterfield proposed, these consequences should still be discernible in the light from distant galaxies but they are apparently not". Right now, according to the newest theories, creationists apparently assume that the speed of light did NOT change.
Sorry, but I'm reverting this. In related issues, it would be awfully nice of Conservative to invite Tmtoulouse back in. This project needs more people who contribute good material, not less. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:29, 9 March 2007 (EST)