Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,395
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + + +
→According to AiG...
Sorry, but I'm reverting this. In related issues, it would be awfully nice of Conservative to invite Tmtoulouse back in. This project needs more people who contribute good material, not less. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:29, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Sorry, but I'm reverting this. In related issues, it would be awfully nice of Conservative to invite Tmtoulouse back in. This project needs more people who contribute good material, not less. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:29, 9 March 2007 (EST)
::Sid, you selectively quoted the Sarfarti article which stated, ""If c has declined the way Setterfield proposed, these consequences should still be discernible in the light from distant galaxies but they are apparently not". The article also stated, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/fine_structure.asp But Setterfield’s particular theory predicted that the FSC would remain constant,7 and given the small change and tentative nature of this new discovery, by itself this is not conclusive evidence against the Setterfield theory.] More importantly, you are ignoring what AIG most recently said on this topic which was a link I cited. [http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v17/i2/cosmology.asp]
::I am giving you the same warning I gave to the other gentleman. I don't want to block you so please heed the warning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:44, 9 March 2007 (EST)conservative