263
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 101:
Line 101: + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Team contest (view source)
Revision as of 14:20, July 12, 2007
, 14:20, July 12, 2007ACE (baseball) and the contest
::::*<small>Don't get angry Fox, this was just a joke</small> [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:29, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
::::*<small>Don't get angry Fox, this was just a joke</small> [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:29, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
::: You just wish you had him on your team ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:33, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
::: You just wish you had him on your team ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:33, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
== [[ACE (baseball)]] and the contest ==
Is [[ACE (baseball)|this]] a result of this contest? It's essentially useless. It has one sentence of inane content, a completely unrelated picture, some unrelated external links, and then an obviously cut-and-pasted list of external links to glossaries, four of which don't mention this term. The title is malformed (nobody types "ace" in all-caps), even the single-sentence is highly debatable, I've heard the term used to apply to any good starting pitcher, not just a team's best (which may not actually be very good).
I just see a lot of mass creation of what I can only charitably describe as entires of questionable quality and it seems to be part of this contest.
By the way, I made a point of not looking at the article history. I don't know who made it, and I don't want to know. I'm just afraid that the admirable goal of helping the encyclopedia has sort of been lost in the rush to [http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=117723 rack up raw numbers]. (E2's experiences in this regard may be enlightening, although it has a very, very different mission.) [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 10:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)