6,786
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 109:
Line 109: +
Conservapedia talk:Team contest (view source)
Revision as of 14:28, July 12, 2007
, 14:28, July 12, 2007→[[ACE (baseball)]] and the contest
By the way, I made a point of not looking at the article history. I don't know who made it, and I don't want to know. I'm just afraid that the admirable goal of helping the encyclopedia has sort of been lost in the rush to [http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=117723 rack up raw numbers]. (E2's experiences in this regard may be enlightening, although it has a very, very different mission.) [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 10:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
By the way, I made a point of not looking at the article history. I don't know who made it, and I don't want to know. I'm just afraid that the admirable goal of helping the encyclopedia has sort of been lost in the rush to [http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=117723 rack up raw numbers]. (E2's experiences in this regard may be enlightening, although it has a very, very different mission.) [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 10:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
::Fix it if you don't Like it :P And as for the quality of entries, you obviously don't remember wikipedia when it first started. It was a mess of cruddy one liners (and it still has a whole shed load of crappy one liners, except they justify them by tagging "stub"...); over the years, some were deleted, some were expanded, some were merged into more cohesive units. What is it with all the critics here who expect every entry to be a graduate-level thesis on the subject? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 10:28, 12 July 2007 (EDT)